[Husker] Texas and Texas A&M to the Big 10?????

[Aaron Wolfson]

I agree, this move would address the question of imbalanced divisions rather
well. Texas and A&M every year, wow!

Aaron


On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Aaron Wolfson <awolfson0 at gmail.com> wrote:

> The assumption that Nebraska is in the Big 10 as of very soon is what's
> driving all these other rumored moves today.
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Skylar Dodds <sklarbodds at cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Yes, nothing will stop the Huskers from switching to the Big 10 at this
>> point.
>>
>> Really, Big 10's perfect blueprint is NU, Texas + 1 (A&M) and ND + 1
>> (Rutgers).
>>
>> --
>> Skylar
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf
>> Of
>> Rod Wellman
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:16 PM
>> To: "Husker List"
>> Subject: Re: [Husker] Texas and Texas A&M to the Big 10?????
>>
>> Is Nebraska still in the Big 10 in this scenario?  This is getting scary.
>>
>> Rod W.
>> Sioux City, Ia.
>>
>>
>> On Jun 10, 2010, at 3:01 PM, Skylar Dodds wrote:
>>
>> > I had heard this early this morning, now a KC TV station is reporting
>> > 'multiple sources' that it's true:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.kctv5.com/sports/23860558/detail.html
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > That would be AMAZING for the Big 10, ironically.  If you add in Notre
>> > Dame and Rutgers the money that would come in through TV would be
>> > almost unfathomable.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Skylar
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > husker site list
>> > husker at tssi.com
>> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
>
>