[Husker] Notre Dame's hand forced now?

[Aaron Wolfson]

Yeah, while they aren't huge in D.C., Maryland provides at least some access
to that large market.

Aaron


2010/6/10 David Elfering <aroundomaha at gmail.com>

> Maryland is a good school with huge research facilities. Having
> attended ther I think it fits the Big 10 profile. It's also in a
> population and exposure epicenter.
>
> ----------
> David Elfering
> aroundmaha at gmail.com
> (402) 522-6545
>
> On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Rod Wellman <gobigred66 at mac.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't know...just one of the names I've heard thrown in the mix of
> > possible schools the Big 10 is interested in.
> >
> > Rod Wellman
> > Sioux City, Ia.
> >
> > On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Tony Lambert wrote:
> >
> >> What would Maryland bring to the Big 10
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> Date: Thursday, June 10, 2010 11:20:23 am
> >> To: husker at tssi.com
> >> From: Rod Wellman <gobigred66 at mac.com>
> >> Subject: [Husker] Notre Dame's hand forced now?
> >>
> >> I've been hearing how ND still isn't convinced it wants or needs to
> >> join a conference.  But could that change in light of the most
> >> recent developments?  And if so, how fast does the Big 10 turn into
> >> a 16-team conference?
> >>
> >> Imagine how quickly the situation is changing for Notre Dame.  All
> >> along they've been saying they are not interested in joining a
> >> conference unless they have to.  Well, the rush to 16 team super
> >> conferences might be that "have to" part of the equation.  Let's
> >> say back in April the Big10 extended offers to Texas, Notre Dame
> >> and an Eastern school, like Pitt, Syracuse, Maryland or Rutgers,
> >> with the promise that it would cap expansion at 14.  With the
> >> allure of the added TV markets, at that point, ND might have had a
> >> hard time turning the invitation down.  Well, Texas HAD to say
> >> "no", because the politics of the state wouldn't let them go
> >> without A&M and T Tech, thus the "Tech problem" referenced in the
> >> email.  So, ND was back to its original position:  that there was
> >> no compelling reason to lea
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>