[Husker] Stick or Quit

[David Elfering]

I find myself divided on this as both a fan and Nebraska resident. To
be honest I see some potential lethargy in joining the B10. Sort like
joining a country club. On the other hand the chice is to stick with
an alignment that may have more potential but is full of sophomoric
intrigue and potential disfunction.

Either way has it's up's and downs.

One thing that tips the scales in favor of the B10 is that it appears
a little more balanced than the B12. It sense to me that OU and all
the schools in Texas do whatever UT Austin say to do and sooner than
later (no pun intended).

I think we have to look further ahead than the next 18 months to make
this decision and to try and set aside our emotional disdain.

To me the B10 makes more sense to the university and the state. But
the B12 measures up better in football and probably for money in the
long term.

I'm inclined toward the Big 10 though I'm not sure the football side
will keep it's hard edge in going that route. It's not an easy way to
go as the travel will be more difficult but it appears to be a step
for UNL and the state.
----------
David Elfering
aroundmaha at gmail.com

On Jun 8, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net> wrote:

> Sam McKewon with the best analysis I've seen of the decision
> possibly facing NU.
> http://nebraska.statepaper.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2010/06/07/4c0dca52c7268
>
> --
> Dick Karre
> dkarre at comcast.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker