[Husker] Niles Paul ticketed

[Jon Johnston]

Hell, as fast as he is, you'd have thunk he'd just run away. 

 What policeman is going to catch him? :) 

Jon Johnston 

On Jun 1, 2010, at 11:09 PM, Kathy Jackson wrote:

> According to my undercover sources (high school kids) you come up with ANY amount of alcohol underage and you are MIPed.  Yes you can refuse a breath test but that just means you will be peeing in a cup or giving up some of the red stuff at the station.  Strategic move if you feel you are on the border line but as I say fruitless if you are going to show anything and are underage.
> 
> Honestly, fire up a couple of extra brain cells and drink a coke, you are a foot ball player for Pete's sake, seems to me that you can point to that if you need "manliness" points.  It never ceases to amaze me - Hi I have a full ride scholarship to a good University and get to play football for a great program.  I have a chance to make something out of my life, give my children the advantages I didn't have and heck that all seems to reasonable and boring so I think I am going to go out and sabotage myself because that is just the way I roll.
> 
> Heavy Sigh
> 
> Kathy Jackson
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:06 PM, David Strong wrote:
> 
>> Yes, I understand public intoxication is a crime.  Paul was not charged with public intoxication, he was charged with minor in possession and public urination.  What has the "express line for the breathalyzer" got to do with it?  He wasn't driving.  Are breathalyzer results the same for public intoxication as for driving under the influence?  Since he wasn't charged with public drunk, and blew a .104, something is different.  If the breath results resulted in the MIP charge as the evidence of possession, would he still have been popped if he had blown a .01, since any alcohol would be been illegal for a minor?  And again, why not refuse a breath test?  He wasn't driving.
>> 
>> Dave
>> 
>> --- On Tue, 6/1/10, Anita Jackson <aj05810 at windstream.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Anita Jackson <aj05810 at windstream.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [Husker] Niles Paul ticketed
>>> To: "David Strong" <gbrlist at yahoo.com>, "'Husker List'" <husker at tssi.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 9:22 PM
>>> David Strong wrote:
>>>> There's one thing I didn't understand when I read the
>>> article.  Ok, he got a ticket for underage possession
>>> of alcohol and taking a leak in public...neither a big deal
>>> for a college kid.  But the article went on to say that
>>> he blew a .104 on the breath test.  Why was he given a
>>> breath test?  He wasn't driving, he wasn't even in a
>>> car.  Was that how they determined we was in possession
>>> of alcohol?  He didn't have any on him but the breath
>>> results showed he "possessed" it in his system?  Can
>>> you refuse a breath test if you are not driving?  I'm
>>> sure it's all by the book (knowing the gestapo...err, I mean
>>> LPD as I unfortunately do) but I've just never heard of this
>>> before.
>>>> 
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Public drunkenness is a crime. Taking a whiz in public is
>>> probably the
>>> quickest way to get caught. Niles is under age, so I'm sure
>>> that gets
>>> you in the express line for the breathalyzer.
>>> 
>>> Anita
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker