[Husker] The fed bringing the heat on the BCS

Mike Nolan nolan at romaine.tssi.com
Tue Feb 2 10:48:21 CST 2010


> I personally like a 12 team format made up of BCS conference champs plus six
> of the best non-BCS conf champ teams (at least 3 from non-BCS conferences).
> 
> Round 1:  Top four seeds draw a bye week while seeds #5-8 host seeds #9-12.
> 2nd week Dec
> Round 2:  Top four seeds host winners of previous week w/ #1 hosting lowest
> seeded winner, etc. 3rd week Dec
> Round 3:  Two BCS bowl locations - Jan 1
> Champ Game:  Third BCS bowl location - Jan 8 or so

I REALLY dislike the idea of byes.  Teams in conferences that don't have a championship 
game could in effect get TWO byes, and the teams that make it to their conference
championship game would have to play in a game that any other teams in the playoffs from 
that conference wouldn't have.  That makes the conference championship game a big negative
IMHO, especially if the losing team makes the playoffs but doesn't get a bye.

If the NCAA basketball tournament is the example of how to do it right, why are they 
changing it?
--
Mike Nolan



More information about the husker mailing list