[Husker] The fed bringing the heat on the BCS

Scott R Lawson SLawson at uamail.albany.edu
Mon Feb 1 08:30:07 CST 2010


Bingo.

Scott in NY


-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf
Of David Strong
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 9:27 AM
To: j j; Theodore Heise; Jon Johnston; Husker List; Mark Landin
Subject: Re: [Husker] The fed bringing the heat on the BCS

If we're talking about an 8 team tournament (I'd rather have 16) then 6
out of the top 8 teams always go to what are now the BCS bowls.  The
other two top teams don't play in a bowl at all, they play in the BCS
championship game.  Doesn't affect the other gazillion brand-name bowls
in any way.  Four of those teams would be available for bowl games since
the quarters would be held in mid December.  So we are talking a minimal
impact on the availability of top teams to the bowls.

Look, the BCS honks have spent time and money convincing everyone how
complicated and hard to implement a tournament would be.  It isn't.
It's not rocket science, it's not brain surgery, it's not a burden on
the players, it's not a conflict with exams.  It's money.

Dave


> Once you take out a good percentage
> of the "name" teams to fill out a
> tourney, the bowls lose a lot of their luster. Fewer elite
> teams
> equals less fan interest equals less advertising money
> equals lower
> payouts and bowl profitability. Bowls would become the NIT,
> basically
> ...



      

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker



More information about the husker mailing list