[Husker] Names for the Big Ten divisions

[Aaron Wolfson]

I recall when the NU move was announced, many suggested that if the Big 10
wanted to be whimsical without being laughable, they could go with "Black"
and "Blue." That sure looks good right now.

Aaron


On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Brad Roth <brad.roth at licor.com> wrote:

> Hmmm...although extremely strong in engineering and perhaps marketing, not
> so great with simple addition...
>
> Might I suggest the following:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZshZp-cxKgand perhaps a crack negotiating team to have a serious discussion about
> names and trademarks with a "Texas Conference" that has now found itself
> with ten member universities.
>
> Brad
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf
> Of Gary Doyle
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:41 PM
> To: Mike Nolan; gzimmerman5 at kc.rr.com
> Cc: husker at romaine.tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Names for the Big Ten divisions
>
> The best reply I saw on Twitter about conference divisions:
>
> "If Big 10 really wanted to distinguish themselves from SEC with new
> division
> names, they could have gone with 'Read' and 'Write'"
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>