[Husker] Miami hires Golden

[Theodore Heise]

>>   This probably never would have happened had the Chancellor not 
>> publically embarrassed him. I believed it was handled badly. That 
>> it should have been TO privately demanding that he make a public 
>> apology.  Employee discipline should not be done publically and 
>> should come from the direct supervisor.
>
> We have no way of knowing whether Perlman's statement was a 
> factor, but it's plausible. You are correct that employee 
> discipline should be done privately, and Perlman certainly knows 
> that. Why then did he do it this way?

Okay, maybe this is naive on my part, but did Perlman's public 
statements really reflect discipline?  It seems he was indicating 
that the behavior did not meet NU standards and that he would be 
talking to Pelini about it.  The actual discipline (if any) was not 
disclosed.  Is it not acceptable for a university official to speak 
about acceptable standards of behavior?  Maybe I'm missing 
something, it would wouldn't be the first time.

-- 
Theodore (Ted) Heise     <theo at heise.nu>     Bloomington, IN, USA