[Husker] Final pool with all coaches votes

[Scott Stewart]

That could be said for last years team. We were a four loss team, but three
of the losses were by a total of 4 points. (you have to exclude the TTech
breakdown). This year no clear breakdown (maybe Texas), and we are in every
game.

I have my rose colored glasses on, but I think NU is a pretty good team.
Maybe not as good as BP rated them, but we are getting better every year.
What I like best about these teams is that they don't give up, and they are
a cohesive unit (especially on defense).

I would be very sad to see BP go to another school (or the NFL).

Scott

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Nick Chevance <nickchevance at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:18 AM,  <stephen.d.bruce at bt.com> wrote:
> > It is interesting to note that Bo Pelini regards his team to be 8 spots
> higher than their current rank (he voted them at #8 versus the #16 actual).
>  No other coach has regarded their respective team this much higher than
> their actual ranking.
> >
> > Interesting stuff...
>
> It is interesting, but then, as long as we're digging into the heads
> of our head coaches trying to figure out if what they say is what they
> mean, I suspect that Bo's ranking is done because he has some lack of
> respect for the polls (who doesn't?).  And because he honestly feels
> that his team performed well enough to be worthy of the ranking we got
> at the beginning of the year - #9.  After all, we lost three games by
> less than two touchdowns total.  How many three loss teams can say
> that?
>
> Actually, one - West Virginia, but I digress.
>
> Nick
> --
> "For every person with a spark of genius, there are hundreds with an
> ignition problem"
>          Coffee News(6/9/10)
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>