[Husker] Ouch!
David Elfering
aroundomaha at gmail.com
Tue Dec 7 09:20:35 CST 2010
Fair enough maybe I didn't give the article a fair shake.
With regard to Osborne the reference it was to the 88-93 time frame
when I think someone could easily have drawn similar comparisons.
But it still surprised me anti when I looked at this years stats and
the fall off after the KSU game. It's like the offense hit a wall and
never came back.
David Elfering
aroundomaha at gmail.com
On Dec 7, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Jon Johnston <cornnation at gmail.com> wrote:
> Uh... the reporter took a look at the entire 2010 season and the drives when Nebraska was trailing or tied after halftime, who ran the plays, and how affective they were.
>
> That's a fair amount of work.... if you don't think it is, I suggest you try it.
>
> I don't see how an Osborne reference is relevant here.
>
> With regards to Martinez - you might find these easier to read:
>
> http://www.cfbstats.com/2010/player/463/1025074/passing/gamelog.html
> http://www.cfbstats.com/2010/player/463/1025074/rushing/gamelog.html
>
> Your assessment of Martinez was correct.
>
> Jon Johnston
> Corn Nation
>
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:48 AM, aroundomaha wrote:
>
>> It is worth discussing, but while I'm not a big Watson supporter I did
>> ponder whether this was a reasonable analysis. If we went back and picked
>> Osborne's worst games and analyzed the offensive numbers in the same way, I
>> think the result might be very similar.
>>
>> In that light I'm not to sold on this article as it seems more like bulletin
>> board message material than something he put much thought into. Now if
>> Chatelain had gone back and over the last three years and pulled out some
>> quantitatively derived opinions it might have been more interesting.
>> Analyzing third down and comparing when Watson passes or rushes plus the
>> effectiveness of both would also have been interesting.
>>
>> But I don't think we need a statistical breakdown to have dark opinions
>> about the Big 12 championship offensive plan :)
>>
>> I think Shatel's article was simpler and more to the point "* it was like
>> the offense was based on the 80-yard run. Where was Plan B?*".
>>
>> With that in mind, the NCAA stats web site says that Martinez did not rush
>> for another TD after Kansas State nor throw another TD after the Missouri
>> game? Honestly I don't know if I trust my eyes on that one so here is the
>> link to see if it looks the same to better eyes
>> http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/playerDetail.jsp?yr=2010&org=463&player=3
>>
>> So back to Shatel's point, I truly wonder if there was a plan b.
>>
>> 2010/12/7 David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.omaha.com/article/20101206/BIGRED/712069878/1048#chatelain-watson-s-offense-fails-at-critical-moments
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> husker site list
>>> husker at tssi.com
>>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> David Elfering
>> aroundomaha at gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
More information about the husker
mailing list