[Husker] possible change in policy?
Mark Landin
marklandin at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 12:55:42 CST 2010
Maybe it was a change in policy, or maybe it was just all a figment of
our imagination that there was an anti-NU policy in the first place.
On 12/6/10, gscratch1 at comcast.net <gscratch1 at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>And with all the negatives we saw in the CCG, I'm happy to note the
>>officiating seemed quite competent and fair. Nice to see a close game
>>decided by the players, not the refs. NU and OU kept NU out of the
>>BCS, not the refs or the league office.
>
> I was thinking this, and the lack of bad calls during the Colorado game, as
> well. Is it possible that the officials were told not
> to continue to the nonsense of the aTm game? With as game as close as this
> one was, one bad call could have made the
> difference.
>
> Glen in IL
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
"He's old enough to know what's right and young enough not to choose
it. He's strong enough to win the world and weak enough to lose it." -
Neal Peart
More information about the husker
mailing list