[Husker] Holiday Bowl

Robert Christensen fourbox at nctc.net
Sun Dec 5 20:48:50 CST 2010


I'm sure that played huge in the selection.  The Insight would have had 
2 Big 10 (from next yer) and no Big XII-II school (from next year).  
Conspiracy?  Maybe, maybe not, but it sure put the shaft to the Huskers 
and I think the Insight bowl.  I don't see alot of Mizzou fans traveling 
to Tucson!

Bob in the sandhills


> Sean Callahan can only say that the big12 -2 didn't want the insight 
> bowl to be a info merical for the Big 10.
>
> Tony Lambert
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lawson, Scott R." 
> <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>
> To: "Tony lambert" <slimmer37 at hamilton.net>; "Lynette Tillner" 
> <ltillner at yahoo.com>; "Scott Lawson" <scott71lawson at yahoo.com>; "Scott 
> Stewart" <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Huskerlist" <husker at tssi.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 5:57 PM
> Subject: RE: [Husker] Holiday Bowl
>
>
> Not exactly what I was hoping for. Washington? Good grief. Who was 
> complaining about playing Connecticut a couple days ago? That would 
> have been a MUCH better matchup! Hate it when bowl games are rematches.
>
> Scott in NY
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Tony lambert [slimmer37 at hamilton.net]
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 6:45 PM
> To: Lynette Tillner; Scott Lawson; Lawson, Scott R.; Scott Stewart
> Cc: Huskerlist
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Holiday Bowl
>
> Sean Callahan is reporting that the Huskers are headed to San Diego to 
> face
> Washington in a rematch.
>
> Tony Lambert
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lynette Tillner" <ltillner at yahoo.com>
> To: "Scott Lawson" <scott71lawson at yahoo.com>; "Scott R.Lawson"
> <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>; "Scott Stewart" <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Huskerlist" <husker at tssi.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 5:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
>
>
> Well, knowing you have a freshman QB with injuries --- why do you go with
> only
> one QB in practice the week before? Seems like we put all our eggs in one
> basket! And then we dropped the basket under a bus!
>
> Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
> ltillner at yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Scott Lawson <scott71lawson at yahoo.com>
> To: Scott R.Lawson <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>; Scott Stewart
> <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
> Cc: Huskerlist <husker at tssi.com>
> Sent: Sun, December 5, 2010 1:00:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
>
> I don't think Green or Lee would have been the answer in the second half,
> particularly seeing that Bo mentioned after the game the players and 
> coaches
> knew Martinez was starting all week, which means he took the great 
> majority
> of
> the first team snaps and the other two kids would presumably not been as
> prepared. Who knows.
>
> I think this is all moot if TM protects the ball better, but that's water
> under
> the bridge as they say. Stoops seems to come up with the answers when he
> needs
> them. I know some are wondering why Bo didn't make a switch, believe 
> me if
> the
> other two were ready to make plays he would have made a switch.
>
> Scott in NY
>
> --- On Sun, 12/5/10, Scott Stewart <fourtwophd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Scott Stewart <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
> To: "Lawson, Scott R." <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>
> Cc: "Huskerlist" <husker at tssi.com>
> Date: Sunday, December 5, 2010, 3:01 PM
>
> I don't pin anything 100% on anything. The world is not that dichotomous.
>
> I do still believe we were out coached by Stoops, and the 4th downs 
> are part
> of my reasoning. However, let me say up front that this is not to say our
> coaches are bad. I do hope they learned from last night, and they do 
> seem to
> learn from these loses.
>
> Stoops came into the game thinking field position wasn't going to matter.
> Nebraska couldn't go 60 yards against his defense. Nebraska, early on,
> showed that game plan was faulty and that NU could shut him down on 
> 4th and
> short. He adjusted his game plan, stopped going for it on 4th down, 
> and took
> points (field goals) where he could get them, ie, he changed from this 
> is a
> fast break/score a lot game, to this is a grind it out and low scoring 
> game.
>
> That was a good change. He also started trying to establish the run to 
> set
> up the pass, which wasn't there at the beginning. Another good strategy
> move. He also let his uptempo offense tire out our defense and then 
> tried to
> overpower us. (A side note is what is the NCAA going to do about these
> uptempo offenses that don't allow the defense to change personnel. It is
> hard to make a rule about getting hurt.)
>
> What good in-game adjustments did we make? I can't and won't pin the 
> fumbles
> on the coaching staff.
>
> We started the game in the I-formation with good results, and promptly 
> moved
> away from it to a more wide open attack. We went to the wildcat with good
> results, and went back to an ineffective passing attack that had not been
> working and didn't.
>
> We stayed with an injured and largely ineffective freshman 
> quarterback, who
> was making poor decisions and locking in on one receiver. Now, maybe 
> Green
> and Lee, were hurt/not better/whatever, I don't know. What I do know 
> is that
> OU had TM's number when he went back to pass and that he was ineffective.
> Yet, we tried the same ineffective passing over, and over, and over, and
> over. Taking us out of scoring opportunities.
>
> IMHO they made much better adjustments than we did. However, given 
> that we
> were amazingly in a game with all those turnovers. So we did something
> right. Defensively we are solid. We just need to get the other half 
> right.
>
> Scott
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Lawson, Scott R. 
> <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu
>> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I want to pin this 100% on the staff being outcoached just
>> yet. Stoops wasn't exactly a coaching genius last night, especially the
>> 4th
>> down attempt(s) that were pretty risky (and didn't work).
>>
>> Scott in NY
>> ________________________________________
>> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of 
>> Scott
>> Stewart [fourtwophd at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 11:01 AM
>> To: Marvin Peterson
>> Cc: Huskerlist
>> Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
>>
>> I am disappointed from last night, but not surprised. Barry Switzer 
>> use to
>> call it Sooner Magic. :)
>>
>> We got out coached last night, plain and simple. Call it TM staying 
>> in the
>> game, call it going away from the Wildcat, etc. What showed is that Bob
>> Stoops has won a lot of these championships and BP is still new to this
>> game.
>>
>> OU adjusted much better during the game than we did. That surprised me
>> because earlier this year I was quite impressed with our adjustments
>> (OSU).
>> Maybe the reason is this is a young coach with a young QB. We seem to 
>> have
>> a
>> tendency to freeze in big games this year (Texas and last night). Last
>> year
>> I thought we did a lot better, but I think we just played everything so
>> conservative that we couldn't make mistakes.
>>
>> I have been a Watson supporter. However, I think the most prophetic post
>> before this game was the one that showed his record in Big 12
>> Championships.
>> We made a lot of mistakes (fumbles, interceptions, etc), but we also 
>> had a
>> weird kind of halfway conservative play calling.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Marvin Peterson <marvsccr at sbcglobal.net
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > It's the 3rd & 24 that keeps bothering me....I was waiting for the 
>> blitz
>> > and
>> > nothing...dropped 7 into coverage, gave Landry Jones 6 seconds to look
>> over
>> > the
>> > entire field and find someone. Oh well...easy to second guess.
>> >
>> > Biggest difference in the game was this year we had the young QB, 
>> under
>> > pressure
>> > who didn't make the best reads. Just knowing when to throw it away to
>> save
>> > drives would have given us a chance at at least 2 more FGs.
>> >
>> > Kudos to the defense overall. Fantastic game....holding a team to 1-16
>> on
>> > 3rd down and keeping a top ten team within 3 points with 4 turnovers
>> > against you
>> > is pretty impressive.
>> >
>> > Now on to the bowl game!
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> >
>> > Marvin Peterson
>> > marvsccr at sbcglobal.net
>> > (858)342-4471
>> > ________________________________
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Greg Zimmerman <gzimmerman5 at kc.rr.com>
>> > To: Shawn Sherlock <shawnsherlock at sbcglobal.net>
>> > Cc: Huskerlist <husker at tssi.com>
>> > Sent: Sat, December 4, 2010 9:12:01 PM
>> > Subject: RE: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
>> >
>> > I'm not sure he was playing scared as much as playing injured.
>> >
>> > His injuries prevented him from being any sort of a running threat. 
>> His
>> > passing was also affected by his injuries. I don't fault Taylor, he
>> > tried
>> > his best with the physical tools he had left. I blame Bo for 
>> putting him
>> in
>> > that position.
>> >
>> > All this and the fact that we only scored 3 points after the 3rd 
>> minute
>> of
>> > the second quarter. That won't cut it against a team as potent as
>> Oklahoma.
>> > The game was winnable but errors in judgement and a number of 
>> turnovers
>> and
>> > near turnovers doomed us. Give Oklahome credit, they did what they 
>> need
>> to
>> > to win the game such as a critical 3rd and 24 when they picked up 23
>> yards
>> > allowing them to go for it and make it on 4th an 1.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Shawn Sherlock [mailto:shawnsherlock at sbcglobal.net]
>> > Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 11:01 PM
>> > To: Greg Zimmerman
>> > Cc: Huskerlist
>> > Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
>> >
>> >
>> > TM wasn't the only one with fumble issues tonight or this season.
>> >
>> > Assuming TM is back the next few years, he is going to be awesome to
>> watch
>> > as he matures. IMO he was playing scared to run.
>> >
>> > That said putting CG in for a series or two may have allowed TM to 
>> watch
>> > from the sideline and potentially allow the game to "slowdown" a 
>> bit for
>> > him.
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> > On Dec 4, 2010, at 10:52 PM, "Greg Zimmerman" <gzimmerman5 at kc.rr.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I was watching the same game you were wiseguy. Martinez couldn't 
>> hold
>> > > on to ball and could get rid of it to avoid the sack.
>> > >
>> > > With Burkhead running the wildcat we were at least looking a bit
>> > > dangerous.
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: krobb0731 at aol.com [mailto:krobb0731 at aol.com]
>> > > Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 10:51 PM
>> > > To: Greg Zimmerman
>> > > Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > What game where you watching? Didn't matter who was the QB, or if we
>> > > went wildcat. OU new what we were doing. Better question was were 
>> was
>> > > Helu in the second half?????? ------Original Message------
>> > > From: Greg Zimmerman
>> > > Sender: husker-bounces at tssi.com
>> > > To: 'Huskerlist '
>> > > Subject: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
>> > > Sent: Dec 4, 2010 9:41 PM
>> > >
>> > > IMO, pin this loss on the hard headed Pelini. Why keep putting
>> > > Martinez back at QB? The wildcat was working quite well with the
>> > > exception of the one bad snap.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Greg Zimmerman, UNL '75
>> > > Overland Park, Kansas
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > husker site list
>> > > husker at tssi.com http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > husker site list
>> > > husker at tssi.com http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > husker site list
>> > husker at tssi.com
>> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > husker site list
>> > husker at tssi.com
>> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>



More information about the husker mailing list