[Husker] Holiday Bowl
Tony lambert
slimmer37 at hamilton.net
Sun Dec 5 19:13:20 CST 2010
Here is a link to a paper in San Diego.http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/dec/05/holiday-bowl-get-nebraska-washington-rematch/
Tony Lambert
----- Original Message -----
From: Lynette Tillner
To: Tony lambert ; Lawson, Scott R. ; Scott Lawson ; Scott Stewart
Cc: Huskerlist
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] Holiday Bowl
Does the Conference have that much pull over the Bowl games?
Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
ltillner at yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Tony lambert <slimmer37 at hamilton.net>
To: "Lawson, Scott R." <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>; Lynette Tillner <ltillner at yahoo.com>; Scott Lawson <scott71lawson at yahoo.com>; Scott Stewart <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
Cc: Huskerlist <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sun, December 5, 2010 4:02:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] Holiday Bowl
Sean Callahan can only say that the big12 -2 didn't want the insight bowl to
be a info merical for the Big 10.
Tony Lambert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawson, Scott R." <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>
To: "Tony lambert" <slimmer37 at hamilton.net>; "Lynette Tillner"
<ltillner at yahoo.com>; "Scott Lawson" <scott71lawson at yahoo.com>; "Scott
Stewart" <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
Cc: "Huskerlist" <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 5:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Husker] Holiday Bowl
Not exactly what I was hoping for. Washington? Good grief. Who was
complaining about playing Connecticut a couple days ago? That would have
been a MUCH better matchup! Hate it when bowl games are rematches.
Scott in NY
________________________________________
From: Tony lambert [slimmer37 at hamilton.net]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 6:45 PM
To: Lynette Tillner; Scott Lawson; Lawson, Scott R.; Scott Stewart
Cc: Huskerlist
Subject: Re: [Husker] Holiday Bowl
Sean Callahan is reporting that the Huskers are headed to San Diego to face
Washington in a rematch.
Tony Lambert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lynette Tillner" <ltillner at yahoo.com>
To: "Scott Lawson" <scott71lawson at yahoo.com>; "Scott R.Lawson"
<SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>; "Scott Stewart" <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
Cc: "Huskerlist" <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
Well, knowing you have a freshman QB with injuries --- why do you go with
only
one QB in practice the week before? Seems like we put all our eggs in one
basket! And then we dropped the basket under a bus!
Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
ltillner at yahoo.com
________________________________
From: Scott Lawson <scott71lawson at yahoo.com>
To: Scott R.Lawson <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>; Scott Stewart
<fourtwophd at gmail.com>
Cc: Huskerlist <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sun, December 5, 2010 1:00:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
I don't think Green or Lee would have been the answer in the second half,
particularly seeing that Bo mentioned after the game the players and coaches
knew Martinez was starting all week, which means he took the great majority
of
the first team snaps and the other two kids would presumably not been as
prepared. Who knows.
I think this is all moot if TM protects the ball better, but that's water
under
the bridge as they say. Stoops seems to come up with the answers when he
needs
them. I know some are wondering why Bo didn't make a switch, believe me if
the
other two were ready to make plays he would have made a switch.
Scott in NY
--- On Sun, 12/5/10, Scott Stewart <fourtwophd at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Scott Stewart <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
To: "Lawson, Scott R." <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>
Cc: "Huskerlist" <husker at tssi.com>
Date: Sunday, December 5, 2010, 3:01 PM
I don't pin anything 100% on anything. The world is not that dichotomous.
I do still believe we were out coached by Stoops, and the 4th downs are part
of my reasoning. However, let me say up front that this is not to say our
coaches are bad. I do hope they learned from last night, and they do seem to
learn from these loses.
Stoops came into the game thinking field position wasn't going to matter.
Nebraska couldn't go 60 yards against his defense. Nebraska, early on,
showed that game plan was faulty and that NU could shut him down on 4th and
short. He adjusted his game plan, stopped going for it on 4th down, and took
points (field goals) where he could get them, ie, he changed from this is a
fast break/score a lot game, to this is a grind it out and low scoring game.
That was a good change. He also started trying to establish the run to set
up the pass, which wasn't there at the beginning. Another good strategy
move. He also let his uptempo offense tire out our defense and then tried to
overpower us. (A side note is what is the NCAA going to do about these
uptempo offenses that don't allow the defense to change personnel. It is
hard to make a rule about getting hurt.)
What good in-game adjustments did we make? I can't and won't pin the fumbles
on the coaching staff.
We started the game in the I-formation with good results, and promptly moved
away from it to a more wide open attack. We went to the wildcat with good
results, and went back to an ineffective passing attack that had not been
working and didn't.
We stayed with an injured and largely ineffective freshman quarterback, who
was making poor decisions and locking in on one receiver. Now, maybe Green
and Lee, were hurt/not better/whatever, I don't know. What I do know is that
OU had TM's number when he went back to pass and that he was ineffective.
Yet, we tried the same ineffective passing over, and over, and over, and
over. Taking us out of scoring opportunities.
IMHO they made much better adjustments than we did. However, given that we
were amazingly in a game with all those turnovers. So we did something
right. Defensively we are solid. We just need to get the other half right.
Scott
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Lawson, Scott R. <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu
> wrote:
> I'm not sure I want to pin this 100% on the staff being outcoached just
> yet. Stoops wasn't exactly a coaching genius last night, especially the
> 4th
> down attempt(s) that were pretty risky (and didn't work).
>
> Scott in NY
> ________________________________________
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of Scott
> Stewart [fourtwophd at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 11:01 AM
> To: Marvin Peterson
> Cc: Huskerlist
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
>
> I am disappointed from last night, but not surprised. Barry Switzer use to
> call it Sooner Magic. :)
>
> We got out coached last night, plain and simple. Call it TM staying in the
> game, call it going away from the Wildcat, etc. What showed is that Bob
> Stoops has won a lot of these championships and BP is still new to this
> game.
>
> OU adjusted much better during the game than we did. That surprised me
> because earlier this year I was quite impressed with our adjustments
> (OSU).
> Maybe the reason is this is a young coach with a young QB. We seem to have
> a
> tendency to freeze in big games this year (Texas and last night). Last
> year
> I thought we did a lot better, but I think we just played everything so
> conservative that we couldn't make mistakes.
>
> I have been a Watson supporter. However, I think the most prophetic post
> before this game was the one that showed his record in Big 12
> Championships.
> We made a lot of mistakes (fumbles, interceptions, etc), but we also had a
> weird kind of halfway conservative play calling.
>
> Scott
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Marvin Peterson <marvsccr at sbcglobal.net
> >wrote:
>
> > It's the 3rd & 24 that keeps bothering me....I was waiting for the blitz
> > and
> > nothing...dropped 7 into coverage, gave Landry Jones 6 seconds to look
> over
> > the
> > entire field and find someone. Oh well...easy to second guess.
> >
> > Biggest difference in the game was this year we had the young QB, under
> > pressure
> > who didn't make the best reads. Just knowing when to throw it away to
> save
> > drives would have given us a chance at at least 2 more FGs.
> >
> > Kudos to the defense overall. Fantastic game....holding a team to 1-16
> on
> > 3rd down and keeping a top ten team within 3 points with 4 turnovers
> > against you
> > is pretty impressive.
> >
> > Now on to the bowl game!
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > Marvin Peterson
> > marvsccr at sbcglobal.net
> > (858)342-4471
> > ________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Greg Zimmerman <gzimmerman5 at kc.rr.com>
> > To: Shawn Sherlock <shawnsherlock at sbcglobal.net>
> > Cc: Huskerlist <husker at tssi.com>
> > Sent: Sat, December 4, 2010 9:12:01 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
> >
> > I'm not sure he was playing scared as much as playing injured.
> >
> > His injuries prevented him from being any sort of a running threat. His
> > passing was also affected by his injuries. I don't fault Taylor, he
> > tried
> > his best with the physical tools he had left. I blame Bo for putting him
> in
> > that position.
> >
> > All this and the fact that we only scored 3 points after the 3rd minute
> of
> > the second quarter. That won't cut it against a team as potent as
> Oklahoma.
> > The game was winnable but errors in judgement and a number of turnovers
> and
> > near turnovers doomed us. Give Oklahome credit, they did what they need
> to
> > to win the game such as a critical 3rd and 24 when they picked up 23
> yards
> > allowing them to go for it and make it on 4th an 1.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shawn Sherlock [mailto:shawnsherlock at sbcglobal.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 11:01 PM
> > To: Greg Zimmerman
> > Cc: Huskerlist
> > Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
> >
> >
> > TM wasn't the only one with fumble issues tonight or this season.
> >
> > Assuming TM is back the next few years, he is going to be awesome to
> watch
> > as he matures. IMO he was playing scared to run.
> >
> > That said putting CG in for a series or two may have allowed TM to watch
> > from the sideline and potentially allow the game to "slowdown" a bit for
> > him.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Dec 4, 2010, at 10:52 PM, "Greg Zimmerman" <gzimmerman5 at kc.rr.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was watching the same game you were wiseguy. Martinez couldn't hold
> > > on to ball and could get rid of it to avoid the sack.
> > >
> > > With Burkhead running the wildcat we were at least looking a bit
> > > dangerous.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: krobb0731 at aol.com [mailto:krobb0731 at aol.com]
> > > Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 10:51 PM
> > > To: Greg Zimmerman
> > > Subject: Re: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
> > >
> > >
> > > What game where you watching? Didn't matter who was the QB, or if we
> > > went wildcat. OU new what we were doing. Better question was were was
> > > Helu in the second half?????? ------Original Message------
> > > From: Greg Zimmerman
> > > Sender: husker-bounces at tssi.com
> > > To: 'Huskerlist '
> > > Subject: [Husker] Bo Knows Stubborn
> > > Sent: Dec 4, 2010 9:41 PM
> > >
> > > IMO, pin this loss on the hard headed Pelini. Why keep putting
> > > Martinez back at QB? The wildcat was working quite well with the
> > > exception of the one bad snap.
> > >
> > >
> > > Greg Zimmerman, UNL '75
> > > Overland Park, Kansas
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > husker site list
> > > husker at tssi.com http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > husker site list
> > > husker at tssi.com http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list