[Husker] Woulda, Shoulda, Coulda!

[Lynette Tillner]

The Defense held OU to 2 Field Goals in the 2nd half! That is amazing 
considering the plays they were making and the field position they were getting! 
The D kept us in the game and gave us a chance.  


The offense struggled after the midway point in the 2nd quarter (maybe after the 
1st quarter!).  Martinez played like a hurt Redshirt Freshman. Not his best game 
at all. Maybe one of his worst. 


All year we've been hearing about this "quarterback competition." Well, since we 
have 3 strong QB's, why did we stay with an ineffective, hurt QB? Any other 
position, they are on the bench the 2nd half. At some point, the coaches lost 
this game by not coaching in a way to get us points (even field goals 
by Henery). 2 Field Goals by Henery and WE would be on the way to the Fiesta 
Bowl and own the Big XII 2010 Trophy. There were field goal opportunities in the 
second half that were lost. What if we had played (especially in the 4th 
quarter) to get those field goals? I know, always play for the TD, but it just 
wasn't working! 


Just my 2 cents!
Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
ltillner at yahoo.com 




________________________________
From: CJolly <jocar26 at cox.net>
To: krobb0731 at aol.com; Husker <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sun, December 5, 2010 5:14:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Husker] Woulda, Shoulda, Coulda!

>>>

He is playing hurt for U, for us, for his team, and for this STATE...

You forgot mom's apple pie 8-)

You are right, Taylor alone didn't lose this game, but he did make 
several freshman mistakes;taking sacks instead of getting rid of the 
ball, throwing into coverage, and fumbling the ball.  I am saying that a 
healthy Zack wouldn't have made those choices.

As far as the defense, I am going to throw it back at you and ask what 
game were you watching?  For Oklahoma to come away with only 2 field 
goals in the second half is amazing considering where they started some 
of their from.


On 12/5/2010 1:13 AM, krobb0731 at aol.com wrote:
> IMOP, what could have Zac done? Bad elbow, mest up hand. We were way ahead and 
>let them back in the game. Wasn't just the offense. Defense didn't play as well 
>either after 2nd Qtr.. Why blame the QB? He didn't loose the game.  SESRIOUSLY?? 
>Did you watch the game????
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CJolly<jocar26 at cox.net>
> Sender: husker-bounces at tssi.com
> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:22:36
> To:<husker at tssi.com>
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Woulda, Shoulda, Coulda!
>
> I am afraid that Cody would have fumbled as well.  If Zack would have
> been in, I think that maybe we could have done better.  I am so tired of
> having a one dimensional quarterback.
>
>
> On 12/5/2010 12:01 AM, Lynette Tillner wrote:
>> So, would we have won if Lee or Green had been at QB in 2nd half?
>>
>> I think so - game management could have given Henery another shot or 2!
>>    Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
>> ltillner at yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker