[Husker] Blown calls

[Aaron Wolfson]

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:24 PM, <huskertt at charter.net> wrote:

> I'm not positive, but I think they did review it, and there wasn't enough
> evidence to overturn the call.  It was very close, in my opinion.  I thought
> it should have been Indiana's ball, but it was very close.  Remember...to
> overturn a call, there must be incontrovertible evidence.
>
> Tommy
> GBR
>


This is how I saw it. At live speed, it seemed obvious that the ball was
simultaneously possessed, but when they slowed it down you really couldn't
pick out exactly when the defender gained full control of the ball. Since it
was called an interception on the field, I think the replay official's hands
were tied.

Aaron