[Husker] What does the VA Tech - Miami game mean to us?

[Aaron Wolfson]

VT is sixth in both polls this week. I expect that from the coaches but not
the writers. It's clear that people were in too much of a rush to elevate
Miami.

I think VT is not as good as they're rated now, but they're not as bad as
they were rated after losing to Bama. About 10th sounds right. And the fact
that the Huskers should have beaten that team has me confident going into
Big XII play.

Aaron


On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:39 PM, <shawnsherlock at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Imo: it doesn't mean anything to anyone outside of chatrooms and
> watercoolers. Teams change so much the first few weeks of the season, which
> combined with VT's earlier loss (I don't think VT was going to expose too
> much more of their playbook on a team they under-estimated) and the weather;
> the VT vs Miami was better than the team we played. However, considering
> beating us by 1 point at home moved them up in the polls a couple spots,
> applying the same poll logic they should now be a top 5 team.
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Chevance <nickchevance at gmail.com>
>
> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:39:21
> To: <huskertt at charter.net>
> Cc: Husker List<husker at tssi.com>
> Subject: Re: [Husker] What does the VA Tech - Miami game mean to us?
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:58 AM,  <huskertt at charter.net> wrote:
> > I disagree.  I think it gives the coaches and players a little bit of
> encouragement and confidence that they can play with the big boys.  VT was a
> very good team that they should have beaten.   Any concerns or self doubts
> should be erased.
> >
> > Tommy Thompson
> > GBR
> >
> > ---- David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> My answer: "Nothing".
> >>
> >> Anyone else have thoughts on this?
> >>
> >> Dave
>
> First, I have to admit that I didn't watch the VaTech/Miami game for
> more than a few minutes.  But I have to wonder what the driving
> rainstorm might have done to both teams.  It was a wet grass field.
> Miami gets its boost from team speed, but a wet turf may have
> nullified that.  I'll be more than glad to hear from anyone who
> actually watched the game to give their impressions.  How the heck did
> VaTech score so many points?
>
> But I'd agree with Tommy.  Again, there are things we learn with every
> game played.  A shoulda-won against VaTech looks pretty good (I even
> heard some talking heads yesterday mention the fact that VaTech
> shoulda come out of the Nebraska game with a loss).  I did watch some
> of the Nevada-Missouri game, and a Nevada fumble inside the Missouri
> 25 towards the end of the 3rd quarter just drained that team,
> otherwise it was going to be another close game.  You put those two
> things together and it gives me pretty good feeling about the Mizzou
> game.  Nevada moved the ball against that Tiger defense; the Tiger
> offense is no way near as potent and sudden as they were last year.
> Our defense is much improved, and our offense is good enough to move
> the ball on anyone.  I personally can't wait.  I think this next game
> is going to be fun.  Agonizing, painful, but fun.
>
> Nick
> --
> “I wish I were less awkward around strangers. I never know what to say
> when someone asks me who I am and what the hell I'm doing in their
> house.”
> Andy Ihnatko
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>