[Husker] Pride

[Aaron Wolfson]

My impression was that the secondary played an excellent game overall. There
were many instances where Taylor either threw the ball away or took a sack
because absolutely nobody was open. Their TE Greg Boone is a big, fast dude,
but they couldn't even find him until the fourth quarter.

O'Hanlon is a solid player, and I love him, but he isn't consistent enough
back there, and unfortunately he will probably become known mainly for that
play. I couldn't help but look on the other side and wish for a Kam
Chancellor of our own. The Huskers need to get that caliber of player in the
secondary before the defense can become truly dominant.

Aaron


On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:56 PM, <huskertt at charter.net> wrote:

>
> I wasn't able to watch the game,  but listened to it on XM radio as I was
> driving East.
>
> Comments about the broadcast (ACC crew).
> 1.  Huskers broadcast is WAY better.  Never knew what was happening in the
> game.
> 2.  The key shaking was for "key 3rd downs"
> 3.  Although the crew were homers for VaT, they slobbered all over Suh.
>  Thought he was unbelievable and definitely a top 5 pick in the draft.
>
> About the game.
> First some positives.
> 1. Suh was fantastic
> 2. LBs were great
> 3. Incredible performance by the D overall.
> 4. Helo is much better than I have given him credit for.
>
> Now for the negatives
> 1.  Lee had a bad game.  Hope he can shake that off, or he will be replaced
> by Green...sooner, rather than later.
> 2.  What happened on the opening kickoff?  Glad that didn't happen again.
> 3.  Penalties were untimely and uncalled for.
> 4.  6 drives in (or near) the red zone with only 15 points to show for it.
> 5.  Sounded like (but with the poor announcers, hard to tell for sure) like
> the DB were getting torched all night, but Taylor just couldn't hit
> them...until the last drive.
> 6.  Too many dropped passes.
>
> Some of the above can be attributed to poor game coaching.  If Lee was
> having a bad day, they should have tried some other things..e.g. a
> reverse...to take the heat off of Helu.  It also sounded like there were too
> many attempts to hit the TE's over the middle.  Since I couldn't see the
> game, I don't know if that is really true.
>
> Still, I'm happy that the Huskers played as well as they did.  Hope that
> they get over it quickly and go on to crush the next two opponents.  I'd
> love to hang 60 on MU.
>
>
> ---- Duane Feldman <dlfeldman at ameritech.net> wrote:
> > I can't disagree with you Steve, but it certainly is disappointing
> > nonetheless.  The Huskers did play well, especially on D and OK on O.
> > Having said that, I feel as good about the Huskers in a loss as I did in
> > wins over Arkie St and FAU.  In the earlier games, NU kept the score
> down,
> > but didn't shut down the opponents.  In this game, the D did a great job
> > shutting down the VT O but didn't keep them off the scoreboard.  The
> basics
> > are there, we just didn't finish.  We need to learn and dominate the
> North
> > plus TT and Baylor.  Kansas is looking solid so far, however and we will
> > have a similar challenge in Lawrence.
> >
> > I'm calming down, but slowly.
> >
> > Duane Feldman
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Steve Stone
> > Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 7:51 PM
> > To: husker-tssi. com
> > Subject: [Husker] Pride
> >
> > I realize a lot of HuskerListers are disappointed and upset by the
> > squeaker lost to Virginia Tech, but my take is a little different.
> >
> > I'm proud of this team.
> >
> > Every early-season game is also a practice, and this one was real
> > test for the Huskers who played with passion and pride. In my book
> > they passed the test with flying colors, and this tough loss will
> > provide them with incentives 'way beyond what a narrow victory might
> > have done.
> >
> > This year's team - - like last year's squad - - is very much a work
> > in progress, and now the coaches and players alike realize what needs
> > to repaired, what needs to be revamped, and what they must to be
> > competitive in Columbia and beyond.
> >
> > I wrote earlier that I did/do not believe this is "our" year and that
> > next year will be our breakout year, even without Suh. We are not
> > only heading in the right direction but accelerating.
> >
> > Steve Stone
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>