[Husker] The Offense
Steven
jfpgroup at suddenlink.net
Fri Oct 16 00:47:59 CDT 2009
I know we are used used to seeing a "strong" or "solid" running game, but
the point I make is as follows: If Zac Lee only completes 34% of his passes
then we better darn well be able to run to make up that void.
Steven K
Class of 83
---- Original Message -----
From: "jon johnston" <jon.johnston at gmail.com>
To: "Steven" <jfpgroup at suddenlink.net>
Cc: "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Husker] The Offense
Why exactly does the offense need to rely on a solid running game?
Because that's what we're used to seeing?
Jon Johnston
http://www.cornnation.com
http://www.twitter.com/cornnation
On Oct 16, 2009, at 12:27 AM, Steven wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven" <jfpgroup at suddenlink.net>
> To: "David Strong" <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 10:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Husker] The Offense
>
>
>> Dave,
>> I have to agree with several of your comments. I think we are a team
>> that is a mystery right now. We have never been in a solid groove
>> against good teams. We need a solid sustained showing against a quality
>> team. I trust that Coach Watson can see the true talent in Zac. This
>> team has to establish an identity. I think it will come from the
>> defense. If they continue to shine, the offense will grow into a
>> consistent unit. The offense needs to rely on a solid running game, and
>> utilize the tight ends. Remember, the TD in the VT game called back was
>> completed to McNeil. He also had one against Mizzou.
>>
>> It is better to be 4-1 and ranked as to be 1-4 and still maturing.
>>
>> GO BIG RED!
>>
>> Steven K
>> Classof 83
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Strong" <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
>> To: "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com>; "Nick Chevance"
>> <nickchevance at gmail.com
>> >
>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:23 PM
>> Subject: [Husker] The Offense
>>
>>
>> After two games against quality opponents, I think that we have a pretty
>> good team. They were both strange games (one where we found a way to
>> lose a game that we had won and the other in a drenching downpour). I
>> thought that the win against Missouri was the most important win for
>> Nebraska since the 2001 game against Oklahoma, including the bowl games
>> against Michigan and Michigan State. This season would blow if we lost
>> that game and that one win makes everything look up.
>>
>> I can't be the only one concerned about our offense, particularly the
>> play we are getting from the quarterback position. If the VT game showed
>> us anything, it's that we have a good running game but not good enough
>> to win the game by itself. Missouri, because of the rain, makes it hard
>> for me to judge much. But no one can argue that in the two games against
>> representative competition, our qb has played poorly. Really poorly.
>> VT - 11 for 30, 136 yards - 2 INT against a good defense. Missouri - 14
>> for 33, 158 yards in a flood. 56 of those on one play. 3 TDs is good,
>> but 2 were off the turnovers. I doubt anyone, especially Zac and OCSW,
>> are satisfied with what we have seen in those two games.
>>
>> Weather forecast for Lincoln on Saturday is partly cloudy, 53. I am
>> nervous about this game. The Missouri win generated so much optimism and
>> enthusiasm not felt in so long, that I don't want it to diminish so
>> soon. I'm just hoping for a win. Cover 10 and a half? Probably not but I
>> don't care in the slightest. I'm still waiting for the game that gives
>> me a good read on this team. I thought it would be VT, it wasn't. I
>> thought it would be Missouri, it wasn't because of the rain. Saturday is
>> big.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> --- On Thu, 10/15/09, Nick Chevance <nickchevance at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Nick Chevance <nickchevance at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [Husker] Wildcat
>> To: "David Strong" <gbrlist at yahoo.com>, "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com
>> >
>> Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009, 10:03 AM
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:09 AM, David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you please try to split that hair a little finer?
>>
>> Ha! Love it!
>>
>> I thought I'd try to steer the conversation towards this week's game,
>> which I had started to earlier by asking who anyone thought would be
>> Helu's backup at RB this week against TTech. Regardless of whomever
>> it may be that lines up at QB or takes the direct snap.
>>
>> Frankly, I haven't heard a peep. Nothing's been said out of the
>> practice reports, nothing's been leaked on the radio. The injury to
>> Burkhead had just been announced before Big Red Wrapup went on the
>> air, but they really didn't address it. I think, or at least I get
>> the impression, that everyone pretty much thinks that it really
>> doesn't matter who it is, that production isn't really going to fall
>> off. I must admit, I really like Burkhead's straight-ahead style, but
>> I haven't seen much of anything on the guys behind him. And again, I
>> know we've all said this before, but this is a team that we should
>> have some success running against.
>>
>> At Mizzou, they were pretty much 8 and 9 men in the box for much of
>> the game. Helu and Burkhead were getting tackled by the safeties.
>> That must tell you something about who else might be open. Where were
>> the TE's? I think on a dry field under good conditions, we should see
>> running proficiency way up, and we should see the TE's much more.
>>
>> The current line is Nebraska and 10.5 points. Do we win? Can we cover?
>>
>> Nick
>> --
>> “Rene Descartes walks into a bar.
>> The bartender asks, "Would you like a beer?"
>> Descartes answers, "I think not." And promptly disappears.”
>> Harlan Ellison
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
jon johnston
jon.johnston at gmail.com
More information about the husker
mailing list