Fw: Re: [Husker] Wildcat

[j j]

But in all actuallity it is not a direct snap to someone other then the qb....it is a direct snap to someone other then your usual qb. If Zac Lee goes to the sideline and Helu lines up behind center he becomes the qb. He is not usually the qb, and he is not listed as a qb on the roster but the fact that he lines up behind center essentially makes him the qb. 
 
Now if Helu lines up next to Zac Lee (who is lined up behind center) and takes the snap then it is a direct snap to someone other then the qb. 
 
 
 
 


--- On Wed, 10/14/09, David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com> wrote:


From: David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
Subject: Fw: Re: [Husker] Wildcat
To: "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 8:19 PM


From: David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Husker] Wildcat
To: "Aaron Wolfson" <awolfson0 at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 9:18 PM







Ditto on thinking Jon is right.  "The Wildcat" I think is more than just a formation, it's a scheme or package or whatever you want to call it.  It does generally involve a direct snap to a back other than the quarterback and like Jon I'm pretty sure it always involves the same motion across the formation at the snap and every play starts the same.  Also it uses an unbalanced line to one side or the other.  I've heard a lot of the commentators say it is a variation of the single wing but that is beyond me.  Lots of folks say it's been used a lot in college for years, only the Wildcat name is new.  I think Kansas State claims that it is named after them because the current version started there with Michael Bishop.
 
Dave

--- On Wed, 10/14/09, Aaron Wolfson <awolfson0 at gmail.com> wrote:


From: Aaron Wolfson <awolfson0 at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Husker] Wildcat
To: "Mike Jaixen" <mikejaixen at yahoo.com>
Cc: husker at romaine.tssi.com, "Mike Nolan" <nolan at romaine.tssi.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 8:30 P


FWIW, they still refer to what Miami runs as the wildcat when Pat White is
in there. I think Jon is right: it's the motion.

Aaron


On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Or there is the original from 2002-03, with Jammal Lord taking snaps from
> the shotgun.
>
>  Mike Jaixen
> http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> http://www.cornnation.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Mike Nolan <nolan at romaine.tssi.com>
> To: husker at romaine.tssi.com
> Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 9:01:12 AM
> Subject: [Husker] Wildcat
>
> It seems to me that there are two versions of the wildcat formation out
> there these days.  In one you pull the QB and use two running backs in the
> backfield.  In the other the QB becomes a wide out.  (I think the advantage
> to the latter is that it keeps the personnel pretty much the same so you
> don't tip off the defense as quickly.)
> --
> Mike Nolan
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker





_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker