[Husker] Breaking News

[Aaron Wolfson]

I think the most likely scenario is that CU scrapes together enough money to
buy out Hawkins and hire a new sacrificial lamb, but nothing changes
institutionally. Which means the same thing will happen again in 5 years.

Aaron


On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Unless they've reached a buyout agreement with Hawkins, I wouldn't expect
> Hawkins to say anything else. Until you are fired, you have a job to do and
> you should plan on doing it.  After all, if you aren't fired, you still have
> a chance to pull things out of the fire, no matter how unlikely it is.
> Survive and advance.
>
> In my mind, it's not a question as to whether Dan Hawkins should be fired
> or not...but rather whether Colorado can (a) afford to buy out Hawkins and
> (b) hire someone better.  Unless some "boosters of substance" become
> involved and change the environment (both financial and regulatory), I'm
> skeptical of Colorado's ability to do either.
>
>  Mike Jaixen
> http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> http://www.cornnation.com
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net>
> To: Husker List <husker at tssi.com>
> Sent: Tue, November 24, 2009 11:29:31 PM
> Subject: [Husker] Breaking News
>
> Denver's channel 4 is reporting that Dan Hawkins says he will be back for
> at least one more year. Yawn.
>
> -- Dick Karre
> dkarre at comcast.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>