[Husker] NU/OU Line

[TODD STRONG]

There will certainly be at least one pick six thrown by Green. IMO. I'm very concerned by the inability shown by NU D-backs to play the long ball giving up big plays. The failure to make catch able INT's will be the doom. 
Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone

-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Wolfson <awolfson0 at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 01:39:36 
To: <jon.johnston at gmail.com>
Cc: <husker at tssi.com>
Subject: Re: [Husker] NU/OU Line

My biggest worry (outside of the general ability to score points) is this:
 fast, opportunistic defense + super-raw QB with accuracy issues = possible
 defensive touchdown(s).
 
 A Green pick-six would be devastating in this game.
 
 Aaron
 
 
 On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:32 PM, jon johnston <jon.johnston at gmail.com> wrote:
 
 > I don't get the fear of their offense. Oklahoma's offensive line sucks.
 > They have some playmakers, their backs are good, but their line is in more
 > disarray than ours is.
 >
 > Both offensive lines are going to get beat up in this game. The difference
 > may be that OU has nothing behind Landry Jones. We at least have two
 > quarterbacks who have a start.
 >
 > Jon Johnston
 > http://www.cornnation.com <http://www.cornnation.com> 
 > http://www.twitter.com/cornnation <http://www.twitter.com/cornnation> 
 >
 >
 > On Nov 4, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Tony Lambert wrote:
 >
 >  On Big Red wrap up last night Damon Benning had the same thought as you
 >> Scott, in that somebody knows something the rest don't. He predicted a close
 >> game.
 >>
 >> Tony Lambert
 >>
 >> Scott R Lawson wrote:
 >>
 >>> I know people always say the betting line is just an indication of where
 >>> the $$ is and limits the bookies' losses or whatever, but don't be
 >>> surprised if the game ends up being pretty close to the line. I am
 >>> convinced there is more to the spreads than what people think...although
 >>> they were a bit off on the Iowa St game. I can easily see a 20-10 OU win
 >>> here, I'm not sure OU can put up numbers like last season against this
 >>> defense, but I also don't see NU scoring unless OU has breakdown(s)
 >>> somewhere on defense.
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> I hate being negative, but this week looks tough.
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Scott in NY
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> ________________________________
 >>>
 >>> From: David Strong [mailto:gbrlist at yahoo.com <mailto:gbrlist at yahoo.com> ] Sent: Wednesday, November
 >>> 04, 2009 9:57 AM
 >>> To: Scott R Lawson; Killmar, John; husker at tssi.com
 >>> Subject: Re: [Husker] NU/OU Line
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> And over the week the line has moved toward Nebraska...which blows my
 >>> mind.  It's now -5.5 which I think means too much money was being bet on
 >>> Nebraska getting 6 so it moved to only give them 5 1/2 and bring out
 >>> more money on OK. Huh.  I never bet the Husker games, but that would be
 >>> an attractive game to put some money on Oklahoma (if I didn't have such
 >>> a personal interest.)  But I thought we would cover the 13 fairly easily
 >>> against Baylor and would have lost all my money.
 >>>
 >>> Dave
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> ________________________________
 >>>
 >>> From: Scott R Lawson <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>
 >>> To: "Killmar, John" <John.Killmar at stjude.org>; husker at tssi.com
 >>> Sent: Wed, November 4, 2009 9:20:58 AM
 >>> Subject: RE: [Husker] NU/OU Line
 >>>
 >>> Same here, if I had to guess I'd say OU could easily win by 20, but that
 >>> is why I never bet!
 >>>
 >>> Scott in NY
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> -----Original Message-----
 >>> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com <mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com> ] On Behalf
 >>> Of Killmar, John
 >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:15 AM
 >>> To: husker at tssi.com
 >>> Subject: [Husker] NU/OU Line
 >>>
 >>> I was a little surprised to see that Oklahoma is only favored by 6
 >>> points.
 >>>
 >>> John Killmar
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Email Disclaimer:  www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer <http://www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer> 
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> _______________________________________________
 >>> husker site list
 >>> husker at tssi.com
 >>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker <http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker> 
 >>>
 >>> _______________________________________________
 >>> husker site list
 >>> husker at tssi.com
 >>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker <http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker> 
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> _______________________________________________
 >>> husker site list
 >>> husker at tssi.com
 >>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker <http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker> 
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >> _______________________________________________
 >> husker site list
 >> husker at tssi.com
 >> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker <http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker> 
 >>
 >
 > jon johnston
 > jon.johnston at gmail.com
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > husker site list
 > husker at tssi.com
 > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker <http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker> 
 >
 _______________________________________________
 husker site list
 husker at tssi.com
 http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker <http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker>