[Husker] Coaching staff

[Scott Lawson]

And I'd like to add that I bet the original post in October about coaching turnover probably appeared right after the loss to Texas Tech (Nebraska's 3rd loss in a row at the time) and was a typical knee jerk reaction because the team was losing.
 
I personally can't imagine why any of the coaching staff would not be back unless they were offered better jobs elsewhere.
 
Scott in NY

--- On Thu, 1/8/09, Steve Reichenbach <reich at inetnebr.com> wrote:

From: Steve Reichenbach <reich at inetnebr.com>
Subject: Re: [Husker] Coaching staff
To: dlfeldman at ameritech.net, husker at tssi.com, slimmer37 at hamilton.net
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009, 2:59 PM

Moreover, it appears that the coaches may be rewarded for a successful
start with salary increases and it sounds as if B. Pellini wants increases
for his assistants.  Washington just hired away an assistant with a
salary that works out to about $700K/year, not so much different than
some head coaches at smaller schools.  I think that staff continuity
(so long as you have the right people) contributes to success and hope
that B. Pellini and T. Osborne develop a structure that fosters continuity.

> I don't think so anymore. At the time, there was some consideration
> to Gilmore going to Wyoming and I think Watson got superficial
> consideration of a HC job but those opportunities have passed.Eckler
> was also being discussed as the LB coach atKSU, but that didn't happen
> either (fortunately).The only job that I am aware of is the BC job and
> I doubt this will affect the NU staff. I think the staff remains intact
> for next year.

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker