[Husker] Recruiting trend?
fourbox at nctc.net
fourbox at nctc.net
Tue Dec 15 20:54:51 CST 2009
It seems to me that the staff redshirted a lot of o-line. My thoughts are that this staff knows to work on strengthing the line as opposed to BC's methods! I predict the offense will match the D next year!
Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Smith <arossman at earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:19:58
To: Husker list<husker at tssi.com>
Subject: Re: [Husker] Recruiting trend?
Another possible explanation is that the drop-off is real, but
temporary. A new head coach, particularly a first time one, usually
scares off a few recruits. This year, it seems that the offensive woes
and resulting conservative play calling may have scared off some
offensive recruits.
If 9-4 or better seasons continue and a reasonable offense returns,
better recruiting classes should also return.
Go Big Red!
Andy
Roger wrote:
> One possible explanation for the perceived drop in recruiting class rank is that B.C. simply went after the players with the most stars behind their name. I believe T.O. found athletes with few/no stars and made 'stars' of them. Hopefully, that is what we will see with Bo as well.
>
> Roger Lohr-Mpls
> -------------- Original message from wpschammel at comcast.net: --------------
>
> I anticipate a bit of flak for this but here goes. Recent decommits and concern over this year's class made me look at the recent recruiting data and, although I may be a tad premature about this, I am starting to be a little concerned
>
>> about recruiting trends.
>>
>> Specifically, I was looking at the Rivals ranking (and yes, I know, this is not an exact science) for Nebraska classes the past few years and we seem to be going in the wrong direction. I like Pellini a heck of a lot more than I did Callahan but the national class rankings are as follows: 2005: #5, 2006: #20, 2007: #13, 2008: #30 (was top 5 until the firing); 2009: #28, and, so far, the 2010 class is ranked #38. I know Callahan could recruit but apparently could not coach; I am now worried that the reverse might be true with Pellini. By the way, the team with the #1 Rivals ranking the past two years is Alabama, so I don't
>> think these data are totally irrelevant.
>>
>>
>> Certainly, the two data points for the 2009 and 2010 classes are not enough to
>> prove anything; I guess i am just wondering if anyone else had the same
>> observation. Here's hoping we land some big ones in the next few weeks and this
>> all becomes irrelevant.
>>
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list