[Husker] Still looking for a QB

Jon Johnston jon.johnston at gmail.com
Fri Dec 11 12:58:11 CST 2009


No, I meant Zac Lee. There's nothing 100% that says he's staying for next year.  And no, I don't have any special insight, just speculating. 

Put it this way - if Gabbert dropped his commitment because of where our offense is going, perhaps Lee may feel the same way after the season is over. He was originally brought in to run the West Coast offense. If they move to a power running game, or something that requires a lot more running out of the quarterback position, he may feel it's best to move on. 

Jon

On Dec 11, 2009, at 12:19 PM, TODD STRONG wrote:

> Lol. I know Jon meant Witt. I was counting...... thousand one, thousand two.....to see how long a reply would take. You win with 44 
> ------Original Message------
> From: Aaron Wolfson
> To: jon.johnston at gmail.com
> Cc: Huskerlist
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Still looking for a QB
> Sent: Dec 11, 2009 12:14 PM
> 
> Zac Lee... wait, what?!
> 
> I still say we're basically set for next year. What QB is going to come in
> and be ready to play in the first year, even a JUCO guy? LaTravis and Taylor
> haven't played because they are backups. That's exactly why they're around;
> in case something happens to Lee, Green, or Spano. Not sure why you need
> more than 5 capable QBs.
> 
> The new QB recruit will simply replace Gabbert (and almost certainly
> redshirt). There's nothing that has changed here.
> 
> Aaron
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Jon Johnston <jon.johnston at gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> We're set at QB?
>> 
>> Zac Lee transfers, Kody Spano has already had multiple knee surgeries,
>> LaTravis Washington has barely played a down, and neither has Martinez.
>> 
>> Cody Green injured, and then what?
>> 
>> We're not set at QB. Not even close.
>> 
>> Jon
>> 
>> On Dec 11, 2009, at 11:46 AM, Aaron Wolfson wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Also, I agree that we seem fairly set at QB, but we don't know what
>> Watson
>>> sees. I really hope nothing has gone wrong with Cody, because I still
>>> believe he is the answer.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Aaron
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker <http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker




More information about the husker mailing list