[Husker] Re: More field goals than TDs?

[Steve Reichenbach]

One of the things that has changed over the years and which
most people don't talk about are chemicals such as steroids
and creatine.  I don't know the history of these substances
at NU or other schools and don't really want to know, but I
do think they have been a non-negligible component of strength
gains for some players in the past.

Again, I'm not saying that this was a factor at NU and am
not saying that the original poster implied that it was.

> >        ...overall the strength level of the past several line 
> > 'incarnations' has been nowhere near that of the pipeline of the 
> > 90's. There are several reasons for this, some of which most 
> > people have no clue about, but it makes a huge difference in the 
> > effectiveness of the line play, particularly with the power 
> > running game.
> 
> is this something you would be willing to elaborate on?  I'm 
> one who has no clue, but would like to.