[Husker] Setting the table

[David Strong]

All those are fine.  None of them are what you said in your original post and what I was replying to.

Dave

--- On Mon, 12/7/09, aroundomaha <aroundomaha at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: aroundomaha <aroundomaha at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Setting the table
> To: "Husker Discussion List" <husker at tssi.com>
> Date: Monday, December 7, 2009, 7:00 PM
> Three extra weeks of practice,
> recruiting exposure and time for Coach Pelini
> to make adjustments against a live foe. Those are all
> pretty valuable.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:47 PM, David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > > From: aroundomaha <aroundomaha at gmail.com>
> >
> > > The table is set for 2010 and hopefully the
> collective
> > > resolve of the players will be toward that end.
> It begins in San Diego on
> > > December 30th.
> >
> > I guess I have to take the flip side on this.  I
> think the Holiday Bowl is
> > borderline irrelevant (though it is probably somewhere
> in the middle of
> > these two positions.)  **Bowl games are
> exhibition games played for
> > profit.** A lot of folks miss this concept. 
> Compared to last Saturday
> > nights game, it isn't worth much.  I don't think
> how we play in the Holiday
> > Bowl against Arizona has anything to do with next
> year.  (next year our
> > offensive tackles will be a year older and we'll still
> have the same
> > quartebacks).  We'll play our best, probably do
> very well, and maybe win...
> > or not.  It would be nice to win, but play well
> or not, I don't think it
> > affects the performance of next years team much.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---
> David Elfering
> aroundomaha at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>