[Husker] Reviewable plays?

[Aaron Wolfson]

The rule allows for review of "egregious clock errors," which this certainly
was.

Aaron


On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net> wrote:

> Smith, William wrote:
>
>> Once again I risk being run off the list...
>>
>> putting the 1 second back on the clock was the right thing to do.  There
>> was clearly a second left when the ball hit the ground out of bounds.
>>
> To be precise, the game clock read :01 when the ball hit the ground. There
> was probably less than a second left before it tripped to :00. I agree,
> though, restoring a second was probably the correct call - if it was a
> reviewable play, which is less than clear.
>
> But I don't think anyone will run you off the List for this.
>
>
> --
> Dick Karre
> dkarre at comcast.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>