[Husker] Misc thoughts

[Shawn Sherlock]

Surprised with all the complaining going on no one mentioned had suh  
been blocked one sec longer McCoy doest through it out of bounds until  
time had expired.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 6, 2009, at 12:43 PM, fourbox at nctc.net wrote:

> It doesn't appear that you have checked the Big 12 web site  
> regarding reviewable calls.  I know its a done deal and discussing  
> it here doesn't mean I'm whining!
> ------Original Message------
> From: Andrew Smith
> Sender: husker-bounces at tssi.com
> To: Husker List
> Subject: [Husker] Misc thoughts
> Sent: Dec 6, 2009 11:02 AM
>
> Blaming any one player for the loss is silly.  There were several  
> plays
> that on their own could have changed the outcome.  And blaming  
> anyone on
> a defense that held Texas to 13 points makes no sense to me.
>
> Putting a second back on the clock was the correct call.  Whining  
> about
> us makes Nebraska fans look bad.  If roles were reversed and there was
> no review, we'd be livid.  And don't forget the early review that gave
> Nebraska a 1st down (and eventually a FG).
>
> If we were told before the game that Nebraska would have 3 turnovers,
> would any of us have believed that Nebraska would have had a chance?
> This was easily the greatest defensive performance I've ever seen from
> any team at any level.  While Nebraska got a field goal after each  
> Texas
> turnover, Texas got 0 points off the 3 Nebraska turnovers .
>
> At least Suh got the praise he deserves and put on a Heisman worthy
> performance.  If ever a defensive player deserves it, Suh does.  He
> won't, but I hope he's at least invited to New York.  If McCoy doesn't
> win the Heisman, we'll have the pleasure of knowing the Blackshirts  
> are
> the reason.
>
> For those who wanted less conservative play calling, particularly when
> Nebraska was in field goal range, considering Zac had 3 ints to his 6
> completions, taking the field goals whenever possible was the  
> percentage
> play.  Don't forget the int thrown after starting at the Texas 37 -
> wouldn't a FG have been nice instead?
>
> It's quite likely that the Texas offense was also being conservative.
> They also knew going in that they didn't need many points to win.
>
> Go Big Red!
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker