[Husker] Was the last play reviewable?
Theodore Heise
theo at heise.nu
Sun Dec 6 10:45:35 CST 2009
> Theodore Heise wrote:
>>
>> I had a question about the officating. Early in the game when
>> the NU 4th down attempt was reviewed and the spot changed, it
>> seemed odd that they would do the review *after* the measurement
>> rather than before. Any comments on that?
> Didn't Bo ask for this? Burkehead was not down where the refs
> first spotted the ball he got about a yard more and thus the first
> down. Burkehead was on a pile of players and no part of his body
> hit the ground.
No, I understand the rationale for the review and thought the change
in spot was correct, I was just wondering about the sequence of
events--when the review happened.
--
Theodore (Ted) Heise <theo at heise.nu> Bloomington, IN, USA
More information about the husker
mailing list