[Husker] Was the last play reviewable?

Theodore Heise theo at heise.nu
Sun Dec 6 10:45:35 CST 2009



> Theodore Heise wrote:
>> 
>> I had a question about the officating.  Early in the game when 
>> the NU 4th down attempt was reviewed and the spot changed, it 
>> seemed odd that they would do the review *after* the measurement 
>> rather than before.  Any comments on that?

> Didn't Bo ask for this? Burkehead was not down where the refs 
> first spotted the ball he got about a yard more and thus the first 
> down. Burkehead was on a pile of players and no part of his body 
> hit the ground.

No, I understand the rationale for the review and thought the change 
in spot was correct, I was just wondering about the sequence of 
events--when the review happened.

-- 
Theodore (Ted) Heise     <theo at heise.nu>     Bloomington, IN, USA



More information about the husker mailing list