[Husker] Reviewable plays?

[Dick Karre]

Smith, William wrote:
> Once again I risk being run off the list...
>
> putting the 1 second back on the clock was the right thing to do. 
>  There was clearly a second left when the ball hit the ground out of 
> bounds.  
>
To be precise, the game clock read :01 when the ball hit the ground. 
There was probably less than a second left before it tripped to :00. I 
agree, though, restoring a second was probably the correct call - if it 
was a reviewable play, which is less than clear.

But I don't think anyone will run you off the List for this.

-- 
Dick Karre
dkarre at comcast.net