[Husker] NU AD - Glenn said what ?

[Scott Stewart]

I know that speculation is half the fun of the Internet, but I think we are
making some big assumptions.

What we know is the Cody Glenn said he sold some tickets and he attributes
this to his being suspended. BP has said "No Comment." and the athletic
department is saying selling tickets wasn't an issue they knew about and are
trying to talk to Cody Glenn.

There are many things that can be going on here. Including BP not wanting to
air a kid's dirty laundry in the press. What he says to the press is not
necessarily what he shares with the NCAA? That Cody was suspended when this
apparently came to light will go a long way with the NCAA. They tend to
reward quick suspensions when things come to a coach or AD's attention.

It doesn't make sense to me for BP to suspend a kid publically and then try
to sweep it under the rug. It does make sense for him to take action against
an infraction and then refuse to discuss the details in the press.

Scott

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:18 PM, David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com> wrote:

> No Laura, I really don't think "no comment" is going to do it.  Cody Glenn
> said specifically that he sold tickets and that Coach Pellini did what he
> had to do.  This clearly says BP suspended him for it.  Now if you are
> saying that BP should stick with "no comment" because of an ongoing or
> potential investigation, that is a page right out of the playbook of every
> guilty party.  Sooner or later, he is going to have to explain.  I guess you
> are saying that later is better?  I would have to disagree. Right now,
> today, go to the NCAA and tell every single detail and go public with every
> single detail.  Don't leave anything, not one iota, untold.  It will all
> come out anyway, regardless of Coach's cooperation or not, and not
> cooperating is the very, very, very opposite of good.
>
> Dave
>
> --- On Mon, 4/27/09, Brown, Laura (LLU) <ldbrown at llu.edu> wrote:
>
>
> From: Brown, Laura (LLU) <ldbrown at llu.edu>
> Subject: RE: [Husker] NU AD - Glenn said what ?
> To: "David Strong" <gbrlist at yahoo.com>, husker at tssi.com
> Date: Monday, April 27, 2009, 5:10 PM
>
>
> If that is the case the Athletic Department and the NCAA will need to
> investigate it not the media, so "No Comment" is the proper response.
>
> Laura
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf
> Of David Strong
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 1:06 PM
> To: husker at tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [Husker] NU AD - Glenn said what ?
>
> If it turns out that he did scalp tickets, and Coach knew about it and
> didn't report it, we're gonna get dinged for it.  In no way is BP going to
> be able to stick with his "no comment".  With this kind of accusation out
> there, he is going to have to explain himself and his reasons for the
> suspension.  Stonewalling looks really bad and always, always makes it
> worse.
>
> Dave
>
> --- On Mon, 4/27/09, Andy Knipp <andy at knipp.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Andy Knipp <andy at knipp.com>
> Subject: [Husker] NU AD - Glenn said what ?
> To: husker at tssi.com
> Date: Monday, April 27, 2009, 3:45 PM
>
>
> The Athletic Dept claims no knowledge of Cody Glenn scalping tickets.
>
>
>
> http://huskerextra.com/articles/2009/04/27/football/doc49f608b130204619241914.txt
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>