[Husker] Athletic Department Budget Cuts?

kaufsss at aol.com kaufsss at aol.com
Thu Apr 2 15:18:22 CDT 2009


When a college professor works the kind of hours a coach works and touches as many lives as a coach does (fans and players and students) I think you can make an argument.  Is society messed up?  Probably, but if any team paid less than $100,000 - you might be a division 2 basketball coach.  Heck - High school coaches in Texas make over $100,000 - which is more than college professors.  


Steve Kauf
A husker fan deep in South Texas

Not the Victory but the Action
Not the Goal but the Game
In the Deed the Glory


-----Original Message-----
From: Rod Wellman <gobigred66 at mac.com>
To: “Husker List“ <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 1:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Husker] Athletic Department Budget Cuts?


Arguing that the athletic program is self supporting is all well and good. But I sometimes wonder about society's priorities. What does it say about us when we spend all this money on sports? Are things out of proportion? I think it's great that 400 athletes can get a college education. But what about the 4,000 kids who would like to go to UNL but can't because they don't have enough money? 
 
Ever since Bob Stoops came along a number of years ago and broke the seal on the top threshold of college football coaches' salaries, I've been of the opinion that there is way too much money involved. NO college football coach should get paid $500,000, let alone a million or two or three million. It's just nuts. 
 
That said, I don't want Dear Old 
NU to fall behind the college football (or college athletics in general) powers. So, NU does what it has to do to keep pace... 
 
Still a sad commentary on our society in general, though. 
 
Rod W. 
Sioux City, Ia. 
 
On Apr 2, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Skylar Dodds wrote: 
 
> Unless I misunderstand it, it's not Athletic Department cuts, it's 
> University cuts. I have ZERO problem with the raise, running a > program like 
> NU deserves WAY MORE than the bottom of the Big XII in salary and > even after 
> the raise he's SEVENTH?? 
> 
> Say what you want, it's just plain what coaches cost these days and > we're 
> getting a BARGAIN on Pelini. 
> 
> I MAYBE could see an argument if the athletic program relied on any 
> significant amount of money from the general University, but it > doesn't. In 
> fact, it brings money in for the general University, so it would be > silly to 
> complain about paying the biggest income-generator for paying a > slightly 
> below competitive salary. 
> 
> -- 
> Skylar 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On > Behalf Of 
> jon johnston 
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:21 PM 
> To: List Husker 
> Subject: [Husker] Athletic Department Budget Cuts? 
> 
> http://www.newsnetnebraska.org/test-huskers-win/cojmc/418-osborne-says-athle 
> tic-department-doing-its-part 
> 
> Read this, tel
l me what you guys think about the university, budgets, 
> and Pelini's pay increase. 
> 
> Jon Johnston 
> http://www.cornnation.com 
> http://www.twitter.com/cornnation 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> husker site list 
> husker at tssi.com 
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker 
> No virus found in this incoming message. 
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.31/2028 - Release Date: > 04/01/09 
> 06:06:00 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> husker site list 
> husker at tssi.com 
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker 
 
_______________________________________________ 
husker site list 
husker at tssi.com 
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker 



More information about the husker mailing list