[Husker] Christensen Reinstated

[Robert Christensen]

Steve Reichenbach wrote:
>> the evidence of Christensen's guilt was weak, as the jurors said.
>>     
>
> I didn't see them say that.  In fact, I thought at least one said
> on TV that they thought he probably did it, but that there wasn't
> evidence beyond reasonable doubt.  Can you point to a news report
> in which the jurors said that the evidence was "weak"?
>   
There wasn't evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.  It would take "stornog 
evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt.  While the juries might 
not have called it "weak" evidence, I would have to think it was weak if 
it weren't strong.

Mike Jaixen wrote (snip) Obviously, the jury felt the evidence was insufficient to convict Andy Christensen.  From what I read in media reports of the trial, I think there was sufficient evidence to remove him from the team.


I think I read where BC was supposed to be a good coach too.  Sometimes 
we have to realize the news isn't always 100% correct, just as the posts 
here might not be perfect.  I'm sure the decision to re-instate 
Christensen was take with due deliberations.

When young people (or anyone for that mater) hang out at a bar, alot of 
things can and do happen.  It seems that most of the things that happen 
after 10PM aren't good.  I think we can look back at any number of 
instances with football players and basketball players where this is the 
case.  Unfortunately it will probably not stop with this incident.

Bob Christensen (no relation to Andy btw).
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> Note:  Please DO NOT REPLY to any messages purporting to come from the Husker List via BSafe Online spam killer.  These are coming from a list subscriber who has this package installed, not from the Husker List.  (This package apparently does not understand how mailing lists work.)
>
>
>