[Husker] Christensen Reinstated

[Dick Karre]

Steve Reichenbach wrote:
>> the evidence of Christensen's guilt was weak, as the jurors said.
> 
> I didn't see them say that.  In fact, I thought at least one said
> on TV that they thought he probably did it, but that there wasn't
> evidence beyond reasonable doubt.  Can you point to a news report
> in which the jurors said that the evidence was "weak"?
> 
> 

I was relying on memory, so perhaps "weak" isn't the term the jurors 
used. But they obviously felt the evidence was not strong enough to 
convict and that, to my mind, ends the matter.

-- 
Dick Karre
dkarre at comcast.net