[Husker] Christensen Reinstated

[Skylar Dodds]

They said that there was zero evidence besides her testimony (no dna, no
eye-witness) which wasn't enough to provide a conviction.

I remember reading somewhere that there were initially 3 jurors that voted
guilty, but switched after some deliberation.  Sorry for the lack of linked
articles.

--
Skylar


-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
Steve Reichenbach
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:41 PM
To: dkarre at comcast.net
Cc: husker at tssi.com
Subject: Re: [Husker] Christensen Reinstated

> the evidence of Christensen's guilt was weak, as the jurors said.

I didn't see them say that.  In fact, I thought at least one said
on TV that they thought he probably did it, but that there wasn't
evidence beyond reasonable doubt.  Can you point to a news report
in which the jurors said that the evidence was "weak"?

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

Note:  Please DO NOT REPLY to any messages purporting to come from the
Husker List via BSafe Online spam killer.  These are coming from a list
subscriber who has this package installed, not from the Husker List.  (This
package apparently does not understand how mailing lists work.)
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.18/1658 - Release Date: 9/9/2008
10:47 AM