[Husker] Code Glenn Suspended

[j j]

I have always thought that indefinite suspension meant that a player had allegedly done something wrong, there was pretty good evidence of it being true, but until it was found to be definitly true and were kicked off the team they were merely suspended incase they were found innocent of the charge in which case they would be allowed back on. 
 
Lets just say for example that a player gets picked up for assult. They would be indefinitly suspended, pending trial, and if found innocent they could be let back on but if found guilty they most likely be dismissed from the team. Not saying this is what is going on with Cody just using this as an example. 
 
 


--- On Wed, 11/19/08, Smith, William <wsmith at towson.edu> wrote:

From: Smith, William <wsmith at towson.edu>
Subject: RE: [Husker] Code Glenn Suspended
To: "husker at tssi.com" <husker at tssi.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 7:54 PM

I've wondered about these cases.  That is, how "indefinite" are
such suspensions?  

Without know what specific team rules were violated or  other relevant
information (e.g. did the player also perjure himself in some way?  did the
player or anyone else try to obstruct an investigation?) all we know is all we
know:  rules were broken, evidence gathered, and the wisdom of the coaching
brain trust has spoken: the player is off the team.

For now. 

That said, what if a player demonstrated considerable contrition such as a
genuine apology  to the coaches, to the team, to the public, etc?  What if the
player was willing to accept other consequences (don't ask me what, just
imagine) and then said to the coaches "Please let me on the team.  I made a
mistake and I pledge to be a better person and teammate.".   If properly
done wouldn't there be a possible reconciliation after even an serious
violation of team rules?  

Again I would imagine it would depend greatly on the specifics of the case. 
These are young men and under proper circumstances deserving of a second chance.
 Of course some lines, once crossed, allow no retreat.  

I'm not sure I've ever seen an "indefinite suspension"
reversed.  I don't remember the exact language of LP's case, but the
language at the time  never impressed me that he was off the team indefinitely.

all that being said, I'd be very surprised if we see Glenn back.  

Bill Smith
Towson, Maryland  
________________________________________
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of j j
[jjj112665 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:56 PM
To: husker at tssi.com; Jeff Volk
Subject: RE: [Husker] Code Glenn Suspended

Well Vick had dogs that fought to the death or were cruelly killed for not
being tough enough. From what I heard about the latest LJ incident is that he
spit on a woman. Lots of difference there. Havent heard the whole LJ story but
that is what I am hearing. Is there more?





--- On Wed, 11/19/08, Jeff Volk <jeffv at alphavideo.com> wrote:

From: Jeff Volk <jeffv at alphavideo.com>
Subject: RE: [Husker] Code Glenn Suspended
To: "husker at tssi.com" <husker at tssi.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 2:36 PM

>It is ironic that a player who sells his tickets can get his school put on
probation, but violence, domestic abuse cases, DUI's, >or other
potential
felonies  are not considered by the NCAA at all (not suggesting CG did any of
those things).  Tell me >something isn't wrong with those
priorities!?!?!?!?


It is a reflection of the strange standards that exist for athletes, and what
offenses are deemed acceptable or not, across both college and professional
athletics.

For example, Michael Vick fights dogs and the World comes down on him as one of
the most heinous villains in the history of sports. Meanwhile, Larry Johnson of
the Chiefs is involved in his FOURTH assault on a woman, and Chief's fans
are upset that the team (and ultimately the NFL) suspended him and are
clamoring
for him to return to the lineup.

Neither crime is excusable, but it is interesting that an attack against
animals is deemed so horrible while attacks against human females somehow seem
more acceptable. Those are strange priorities that I think are substantially
off
kilter as well (sorry PETA members).

Jeff


THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS EMAIL MESSAGE AND IN ANY ACCOMPANYING
ATTACHMENT IS A
CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION.  IT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF
THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT OR RECIPIENTS.  IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR THE EMPLOYEE
OR AGENT
RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER THIS EMAIL TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S), YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT ANY
DISCLOSURE, COPYING OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS TRANSMISSION IS
STRICTLY
PROHIBITED.  IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS EMAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US
IMMEDIATELY BY PHONE.


_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker




_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker