[Husker] TO's Article
Theodore Heise
theo at heise.nu
Mon May 26 14:54:48 CDT 2008
On Sun, 25 May 2008, Bob Beach wrote:
> ...I have always been of the opinion you can't treat an
> athlete any different than any other college student. Any student
> is free to put in as many years in college as they choose, There
> is no mandatory three years. The thing that rings hollow to me is
> are most of the statements, including TO's, trying to do what is
> right for the kid or is the motivation to look out for the
> athletic department? On one hand TO says if you want to go to the
> NBA right out of High School then go but if you don't you can't go
> for three years. Its obvious his motivation isn't the kid.
It's not obvious to me. Sure, your hypothesized motivation ("once a
program has him we can be assured we have him for three years") is
possible, but it could also be that Osborne believes two major life
changes in a single year isn't good for a kid. I'm sure there could
be other possible motivations--especially in the mind of someone
with a Ph.D. in educational psychology.
--
Theodore (Ted) Heise <theo at heise.nu> Bloomington, IN, USA
More information about the husker
mailing list