[Husker] Nebraska beat TX Tech

[Steve Reichenbach]

> > There aren't any more "must wins" this year (unless they are all
> > "must wins") because they have almost no chance of going to the
> > NCAA tournament.  Even getting back to .500 in the conference
> > seems a stretch.  Very likely losses are @A&M and @Texas and
> > likely KSU. 
> 
> I guess I didn't realize the only "must wins" out there are those
> that affect your position to go to the NCAA.  I'll remember that.

By definition, there must be something specific (such as making the
NCAA tournament) depending on the outcome of that a "must game" (as
opposed to depending on multiple outcomes, such as an improving
record).  So, for example, if NU goes 7-1 the rest of the way (to
finish 10-6 in the conference), it doesn't really matter which game
they lose, ergo there is no "must win".  If there is a "must win"
left on the schedule, you'll have to explain it.

> > Texas Tech really isn't very good.
> 
> I am not sure what any of that has to do with the Huskers winning
> the game.

You left out what was written in the first post of the thread to
which I was responding:

> > [W]as this as good of a win as it looked on the Highlights or is
> > TT bad now without Knight  ( Bobby that  is...)

In fact, how good Tech is has quite a bit to do with the Huskers
winning the game.

Feeling disagreeable, Bob?  I guess that's "Situation Normal".