[Husker] Volleyball

[jon johnston]

He didn't keep Yanz at PSU. She left and is at Nebraska, but since she  
was not granted release has to sit out a year.

Put it this way, John Cook doesn't have a problem with it, so why do  
we? Cook says he considers Rose like a brother.... from the article:

  "Once a Husker, always a Husker," Cook said. "I feel like Coach Rose  
and I are probably almost like best buddies or brothers because we're  
both Huskers.""

Normally coaches don't say anything bad about each other, but if they  
don't like each other, they certainly wouldn't say anything that good.

BTW, we (Nebraska) have done the same, allowed transfers but  
restricted where the transfer would go. I get the feeling it happens a  
lot in non-revenue sports, but since there's not much coverage, nobody  
cares... or maybe nobody notices.

Jon Johnston
http://www.cornnation.com

On Dec 19, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Mark Landin wrote:

>>
>>
>> Put it this way. Businesses protect their own interests with non- 
>> compete
>> clauses. If Rose would have released Yanz and let her play this  
>> year, he
>> wouldn't have been looking out for the interests of Penn State  
>> volleyball.
>> He did the right thing for his team.
>
> By keeping a player who doesn't want to be there, and showing the rest
> of his team he doesn't really care about how any of them feel, that
> he's just going to do whatever he is able to in order to benefit his
> team? Isn't this the slippery slope that ends at a place we call "win
> at all costs"?
>
> By that logic, LP should never have been suspended.
>
> College athletics is still SUPPOSED to have a little bit of nobility
> and altruism to it. It is NOT supposed to have a business mindset of
> do whatever you can get away with to get something over on somebody
> else. "In the deed the glory". Do those words ring hollow to you?