[Husker] Posts and Frustrations

[Lynette Tillner]

Scott, 

I think we've hit one of your "pet peeve" buttons! :-) 

I think that the poster that changes the subject within their
response text, should, out of curtesy to the list, modify the subject
line. 

It doesn't happen like it should and most response let the now
incorrect subject line proliferate throughout the entire thread of
emails. 

You are preaching to the choir here, but getting the list members to
change their ways on this is about as likely as Bob agreeing with
everything said on the list! :-) <grin!>

Lynette


--- Scott Lawson <scott71lawson at yahoo.com> wrote:

> See this is where I have a problem with this whole discussion- it's
> amazing to me that no one seems to have picked up on this yet
> (which I don't believe is by accident), but I for one had posted
> earlier that I have no problem whatsoever with what folks talk
> about on here- yes, I can simply delete what I do not wish to read
> (and do), but when they talk about topics that have little or
> nothing to do with what the actual subject line of the message
> reads (which I will bet is the way most on here determine if they
> will read a post or not) it is quite inconsiderate tot he reader
> And yes, I am interested in the basketball team and the extension
> given to coach Sadler.
> 
> However I am absolutely convinced there are folks on this list (and
> ALL lists for that matter) who purposely mislead people with
> inaccurate subject lines so they do not automatically delete what
> has been written. I also believe this is one of the contributing
> factors as to why so many insightful posters have become lurkers or
> left altogether.
> 
> At least this thread no has an accurate subject line.
> 
> Scott in NY
> 
> Bob Beach <rbeach at neb.rr.com> wrote: Lynette Tillner wrote:
> > I honestly feel the subject of whether SP was a good or bad AD is
> > water under the bridge. Just like Solich is water under the
> bridge. I
> > did change the subject line enough to make it more relevant to
> what
> > was REALLY being talked about. The "subject" had changed from
> > Sadler's contract extension to SP LONG before I chimed in and
> > commented that I felt it was "enough."
> >   
> 
>      I agree it is water under the bridge.  However, if it
> interests 
> people, and obviously it does, then why do you care?  The list
> belongs 
> to many people with many interests.  If people are posting to a
> subject 
> then they are interested in the subject and that is great.
> 
> 
> 
> Bob Beach
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 
> Note:  Comcast has been bouncing a lot of list traffic recently. 
> The problem appears to be on their end.
> 
> 
>        
> ---------------------------------
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of
> Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 
> Note:  Comcast has been bouncing a lot of list traffic recently. 
> The problem appears to be on their end.
> 


Lynette Tillner
ltillner at yahoo.com


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.  
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com