[Husker] What exactly is the defense doing?

[jonlists at cbsol.com]

"you guys" is the list. When I reply to something, I'm replying to the 
list, not the original poster. 

Jon Johnston
http://www.cornnation.com

husker-bounces at tssi.com wrote on 09/08/2007 04:31:40 PM:

> jonlists at cbsol.com wrote:
> 
> >I don't think Grixby got away with it... given the perspective.... 
> >explained that here: 
> >http://www.cornnation.com/storyonly/2007/9/8/154951/6531
> > 
> >
> We got away with one on that particular play, and the above 
> "perspective" doesn't really do much to convince me otherwise.  It's 
> exactly what I expected to read from glancing at the URL - a biased fan 
> trying to justify the non-call using some pretty silly logic.  I'm not 
> saying the refs titled the game in favor of Nebraska, but that should 
> have been a penalty.  I'd be saying the same thing if it was Nebraska 
> that got jobbed..  Despite that, Nebraska's defense looked good on that 
> last stop.
> 
> >next, USC doesn't need this game film to determine how to beat our 
> >defense. Wake runs an offense that lives off misdirection, and that's 
what 
> >they did. they did it very well. 
> > 
> >
> >Wake isn't a pushover. They had a good front seven. Our defense wasn't 
the 
> >problem. 
> >
> >You guys should be more concerned with the fact that our offense called 

> >and played a good game, but our main guy consistently missed. That's 
bad. 
> >that's very bad. 
> > 
> >
> I never said the defense was the problem today, so I'm not going to 
> consider myself part of the "guys" you mention.  I agree with you on 
Keller.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker