[Husker] What exactly is the defense doing?

[Pat Gaule]

jonlists at cbsol.com wrote:

>I don't think Grixby got away with it... given the perspective.... 
>explained that here: 
>http://www.cornnation.com/storyonly/2007/9/8/154951/6531
>  
>
We got away with one on that particular play, and the above 
"perspective" doesn't really do much to convince me otherwise.  It's 
exactly what I expected to read from glancing at the URL - a biased fan 
trying to justify the non-call using some pretty silly logic.  I'm not 
saying the refs titled the game in favor of Nebraska, but that should 
have been a penalty.  I'd be saying the same thing if it was Nebraska 
that got jobbed..  Despite that, Nebraska's defense looked good on that 
last stop.

>next, USC doesn't need this game film to determine how to beat our 
>defense. Wake runs an offense that lives off misdirection, and that's what 
>they did. they did it very well. 
>  
>
>Wake isn't a pushover. They had a good front seven. Our defense wasn't the 
>problem. 
>
>You guys should be more concerned with the fact that our offense called 
>and played a good game, but our main guy consistently missed. That's bad. 
>that's very bad. 
>  
>
I never said the defense was the problem today, so I'm not going to 
consider myself part of the "guys" you mention.  I agree with you on Keller.