[Husker] Important? Unimportant?
j j
jjj112665 at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 15 15:57:03 CDT 2007
I have heard several people say that BC knows football inside and out. I dont get this. What in the last 4 years or his 2 at Oakland makes anyone say that? He took a mediocre (SPs words) football team and took them to the bottom. He took a superbowl team and made them 2-14. How is any of this knowing football inside and out. Is it that he has a 4000 page playbook? I can sit down and write up a bunch of plays but I sure dont know football inside and out. If he knew it inside and out I would think we would be playing alot better. He just seems to know the right people to get a job.
Steve Stone <sstone at pvtnetworks.net> wrote:
Frequently things happen to college football teams, things that are
beyond the power of coaches to deal with or even affect. Sometimes
teams don't "gel" or lack leadership or are missing one or even two
key components. Not every losing team is the victim of poor coaching.
That said, Callahan has shown me a couple of positive things and a
couple of negative things, so I thought I'd share with you other
kiddies to find out you're thinking:
Positives:
1) The man knows football, inside and out.
2) The man works at the game like a demented gnome.
3) Since arriving at NU, the man has shown signs of adapting to some
of the peculiar circumstances of the state and the program, albeit
somewhat slowly.
4) The man has been signing more "multiple star" HS recruits lately,
which is at least good publicity.
5) The man has been signing top-notch JC recruits lately.
Negatives:
1) The man seems possessed by the NFL mentality that the starting
quarterback must play the entire game no matter what. He didn't give
Joe Ganz a whirl even in the latter parts of the MU and OSU games
when clearly some sort of change seemed necessary. (As the man said
to the forty-four year old virgin....")
2) The man makes it virtually impossible for fans and the public to
know when he's is being candid or opaque in his public
pronouncements. I hold that while we shouldn't know everything, we're
entitled to know s o m e t h i n g.
3) The man's head remains buried in playsheets (midway through the
season) when the quarterback trots back to the bench for
instructions. Is the WC offense THAT complicated?
4) Does the man need to immerse himself in statistical data in order
to be able to call about five basic running plays and six basic
passing plays?
5) The man needs to enlarge his public-communication vocabulary
beyond "No question," "absolutely," and "huge." I'm not asking for
William Jennings Bryan here, just a smattering of plain-English
synonyms.
Steve Stone
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
---------------------------------
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
More information about the husker
mailing list