[personal] Re: [Husker] Davidson

todd strong strongtodd at msn.com
Mon Oct 8 19:40:05 CDT 2007


The offense has not done well, IMO.
They do not have the ability to make things happen when needed.

"Would the boy I was yesterday, be proud of the man I am today?"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Skylar Dodds" <sklarbodds at cox.net>
To: "'Pat Gaule'" <pgaule at cox.net>; <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 5:18 PM
Subject: RE: [personal] Re: [Husker] Davidson


>> Nebraska is 4-2 and could very easily be 2-4 at this point.  I really
>> don't see how anyone can claim that as a "great season."  A .666
>> winning
>> percentage may be considered "good", but it's hardly great.
>> Futhermore,
>> I believe that Nebraska will finish with a winning percentage much
>> closer to .500, and that is definitely not a good mark at Nebraska.  I
>> wouldn't consider the 2007 Huskers a "good" football team, and I
>> wouldn't even consider the label of "great."
>
> Maybe I didn't come across clear.  My point was the offense has done well.
> It really has, like it or not.  They barely got on the field last night. 
> In
> the last 2 games, the opposition has ran 187 plays to our 127.  Wow.
>
> I'm not claiming the team was great or has played great.  You can tell us
> how we could be 2-4, but the fact of the matter is we're not.  Please, use
> facts in your argument, not 'could be'.
>
> BC should get the chance to replace his coordinator, if he doesn't.  Then 
> he
> wouldn't be doing his job and he should be replaced.
>
> --
> Skylar
> mailto: sklarbodds at cox.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 



More information about the husker mailing list