[personal] Re: [Husker] Davidson
todd strong
strongtodd at msn.com
Mon Oct 8 19:40:05 CDT 2007
The offense has not done well, IMO.
They do not have the ability to make things happen when needed.
"Would the boy I was yesterday, be proud of the man I am today?"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Skylar Dodds" <sklarbodds at cox.net>
To: "'Pat Gaule'" <pgaule at cox.net>; <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 5:18 PM
Subject: RE: [personal] Re: [Husker] Davidson
>> Nebraska is 4-2 and could very easily be 2-4 at this point. I really
>> don't see how anyone can claim that as a "great season." A .666
>> winning
>> percentage may be considered "good", but it's hardly great.
>> Futhermore,
>> I believe that Nebraska will finish with a winning percentage much
>> closer to .500, and that is definitely not a good mark at Nebraska. I
>> wouldn't consider the 2007 Huskers a "good" football team, and I
>> wouldn't even consider the label of "great."
>
> Maybe I didn't come across clear. My point was the offense has done well.
> It really has, like it or not. They barely got on the field last night.
> In
> the last 2 games, the opposition has ran 187 plays to our 127. Wow.
>
> I'm not claiming the team was great or has played great. You can tell us
> how we could be 2-4, but the fact of the matter is we're not. Please, use
> facts in your argument, not 'could be'.
>
> BC should get the chance to replace his coordinator, if he doesn't. Then
> he
> wouldn't be doing his job and he should be replaced.
>
> --
> Skylar
> mailto: sklarbodds at cox.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
More information about the husker
mailing list