[Husker] Time's Up, Bill

[andy at knipp.com]

Yes and the coach is judged on that finished product. If there is a 
problem, he is the one responsible to fix it. The continued claim that 
the lack of talen left by FS just won't cut it anymore, esp when there 
are a number of them (on D) in the NFL. 

If there was a crushing D and a O that was a work in progress, there 
would not be as much dissension as there is. 

Coaches live and die by the assistants they choose. BC fired one of 
the top DC (according to Rivals BP is the #2 DC in the college ranks) 
to bring in "his guy". 

Do I think BC should be fired today ? No. KC ? TTech showed there is a 
precedent for it. But that is the coaches call, however if NU continues 
the current level of play and ends up 6-6 (not an unreasonable thing 
considering how much better KU/KSU/CU are), then the U must seriously 
consider replacing BC (and eating a very large contract). That fact 
alone is why SP should be out the door as well. 


>Most of us, as fans, do not know the intricacies of a college 
football 
>program...or of an athletic department for that matter.  We only see 
the 
>finished product, and we make assumptions on what we see.
>
>Some folks on the list are much closer to the program, and they 
could 
>probably shed more light on what is going on.  Maybe they can't speak 
up, or 
>won't.