[personal] Re: [Husker] Davidson

[Skylar Dodds]

> Nebraska is 4-2 and could very easily be 2-4 at this point.  I really
> don't see how anyone can claim that as a "great season."  A .666
> winning
> percentage may be considered "good", but it's hardly great.
> Futhermore,
> I believe that Nebraska will finish with a winning percentage much
> closer to .500, and that is definitely not a good mark at Nebraska.  I
> wouldn't consider the 2007 Huskers a "good" football team, and I
> wouldn't even consider the label of "great."

Maybe I didn't come across clear.  My point was the offense has done well.
It really has, like it or not.  They barely got on the field last night.  In
the last 2 games, the opposition has ran 187 plays to our 127.  Wow.

I'm not claiming the team was great or has played great.  You can tell us
how we could be 2-4, but the fact of the matter is we're not.  Please, use
facts in your argument, not 'could be'.

BC should get the chance to replace his coordinator, if he doesn't.  Then he
wouldn't be doing his job and he should be replaced.  

--
Skylar
mailto: sklarbodds at cox.net