[Husker] BC on Wiki
Baseballguy
baseballguy at neb.rr.com
Sun Nov 25 13:03:23 CST 2007
--- Source message ---
From: "Nick Chevance" <nickchevance at gmail.com>
Sent: 11/25/2007 11:38:53
Subject: Re: [Husker] BC on Wiki
>>But of course that wasn't the issue we were discussing. We were
>> replying to your assertion that it was just wins, and several pointed
>> out that it wasn't just wins.
I know other things enter in but it still comes down to wins and losses.
If the team was supposedly thought to be 8-4 and they went 6-6 but were
competitive and the Head Coach ran a class program honoring tradition and
all that it would probably save his job. When TO gave Callahan the
benchmarks he had to meet nothing was said other than wins and losses.
We all, including me, would like to think we are about more than winning.
And in reality we like to see a clean program that is run right. But,
that isn't enough for most fans. Even with all the things about Callahan
like him doing away with tradition, altering the walk-on program,
shutting out former players, shutting out the media, being arrogant, and
the like I doubt any of that would have been an issue if he went
undefeated the last three years.
>>And as far as the glory years, I disagree. I think teams will continue to
>> be very good for long periods of time. National Championships every year?
>> No way. 8 and 9 win seasons repeatedly? Sure. Look at Texas. Look at
>> Oklahoma. Look at USC. There are lots of teams like that. Not dominant
>> in the number of national championships, but successful seasons. That's
>> what I think Husker fans want.
I don't argue with that. I think teams can have a measure of success for
years but I wouldn't expect the dominance of the TO years. I could see
some years having 9 plus wins but some years may be 8-4 or 7-5 and the
like. And then it depends also how one defines a successful season. I
would guess to the overwhelming number of NU fans anything less than 9
wins isn't considered successful.
Bob Beach
More information about the husker
mailing list