[Husker] BC on Wiki

[Nick Chevance]

On Nov 25, 2007 9:46 AM, Baseballguy <baseballguy at neb.rr.com> wrote:

>
>     Maybe I am missing something but I don't see any evaluation there
> other
>     than how many games were won and lost.
>
>
> Bob Beach


I don't have the transcript of the press conference in front of me, and
frankly I don't think all this argument amounts to a hill of beans (there's
an old fogey phrase if I do say so myself!) because its done and over, but
Dr. Tom did say that the Kansas loss was a big factor.  That it was more
than just losing, but a factor was how they played.  I believe he figured if
they lost all of their games, they weren't being competitive, and I doubt
we'd disagree with that.  If they played hard but lost narrowly, there might
be some give in the evaluation.  K State was an ugly win - an old fashion
butt kick.  But Kansas was a meltdown, Okie State was a meltdown, aTm and CU
were complete 2nd half meltdowns.  The benchmarks were clear; they were
evaluated not only on wins and losses, but also how they won and how they
lost.  Ugly is the only word that comes to my mind.

Nick

-- 
"Some guy hit my fender, and I told him, 'Be fruitful and multiply,' ... but
not in those words."
Woody Allen