[Husker] what problem are we solving?

[Pat Gaule]

Pat Gaule wrote:

> Kaufsss at aol.com wrote:
>
>> Hey - guess I am a realist - 13-0 and a 4 ranking - guess I would be 
>> OK with that - it means we are back and will be worrying that 
>> Callahan might be lured back to the NFL - while a lot accuse him of 
>> being a traitor!!!
>>  
>
>
> If Nebraska was good enough to go 13-0 against next year's schedule, 
> then it would be criminal that we never knew how good Nebraska really 
> was.  There is nothing "realistic" about playing a weak schedule to 
> increase the number of wins.  I would consider that to be the exact 
> opposite of "realistic."
>
> And while we're focusing on realism, I see absolutely no way that 
> Nebraska goes undefeated next year.
>
>

Sorry...I meant 2009's schedule and not "next year's"