[personal] Re: [Husker] 2008-2009 NU Football Schedules Set & USC Tickets

[Skylar Dodds]

I actually think (with the exception of next year) the schedules have been
the best it's been in decades.

Scheduling one major opponent (USC, Va Tech, Tennesee, etc), 1 mid opponent
(WF, etc) and 1-2 weak opponents (Maine, Utah St, etc) are the best possible
schedules.  I don't want to play top 25 teams all 4 preseason games.  It's
great for season ticket holders, but it's not great for the team.

The year the 'major' team is on the road (2008) it's a little rough as far
as good home opponents, but playing them on the road is enough for me.

If you think this schedule sucks, who's better?  The only one I can really
think of is FSU with the other Florida schools.  Almost EVERY major Div I
school schedules ONE (if that) tough opponent each year and then a couple
patsies to pad their record.  That's college football, plain and simple.

GO SKERS!

--
Skylar
mailto:sklarbodds at cox.net

-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
Bob Beach
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:05 PM
To: Husker List
Subject: [personal] Re: [Husker] 2008-2009 NU Football Schedules Set & USC
Tickets

Michael Petersen wrote:
> Are we modeling our program after Kansas State? My apologies to all 
> their fans that I laughed at for their similar schedules a few years ago.
>
> Lets just hope we don't lose one of them. You can tell that the 
> strength of schedule factor has been removed officially from the BCS - 
> but the voters see who the teams play and it still factors in.
>
>
      Would you like to see Ohio State, Notre Dame, Florida, and USC for 
our pre-season schedule?


Bob Beach

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/787 - Release Date: 5/3/2007 2:11
PM